fix: remove redundant ids and userIdentifier when gbraid or wbraid are there

[ItsSudip]

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

We are doing the following changes:

1. We can pass only one of gclid, wbraid and gbraid. If all three are available we are considering gclid. If both wbraid and gbraid are available without gclid we are throwing error.
2. We don't need to pass userIdentifier if any click ids are available. But if we send userIdentifiers along with gclid then Google ads is accepting that. So we are not changing that behaviour, we just stopped throwing errors.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2942

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review

---

Developer checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project

• No breaking changes are being introduced.

• All related docs linked with the PR?

• All changes manually tested?

• Any documentation changes needed with this change?

• Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

• Is the PR limited to one linear task?

• Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

• Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

• Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

[devops-github-rudderstack]

Test report for this run is available at: https://test-integrations-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/integrations-test-reports/rudder-transformer/3910/test-report.html

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.48%. Comparing base (275e971) to head (38b3f3c).
Report is 6 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3910   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    90.47%   90.48%           
========================================
  Files          615      615           
  Lines        32320    32343   +23     
  Branches      7677     7687   +10     
========================================
+ Hits         29242    29265   +23     
  Misses        2822     2822           
  Partials       256      256           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
4 New Major Issues (required ≤ 1)
5 New Code Smells (required ≤ 1)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE