Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[envtest]Improve coverage #63

Conversation

gibizer
Copy link
Collaborator

@gibizer gibizer commented Sep 14, 2023

We now at least covering the happy deployment path.

Related: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-108

This adds a test case to show that placement-operator does not ensure
that the expected fields are in the provided secret so it can generate
wrong dbsync job configuration.
This increased or coverage from 38 to 70 percent
This is needed as we want to switch from the hardcoded "placement"
PlacementAPI name to a generated one
This has two benefits:
* shows where placement-operator hardcodes names instead of using the
  name of the PlacementAPI CR like in case of the db sync Job and the
  Deployment.
* allows more test case independency
Now that the test global variable handling is improved the test can run
in any order.
Copy link
Contributor

@mrkisaolamb mrkisaolamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gibizer, mrKisaoLamb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [gibizer,mrKisaoLamb]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 98b1b73 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Sep 21, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants