Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to modify number of samples used for averaging #44

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RouquinBlanc
Copy link

As it was, average was always performed using all samples from the start of scan.

Adding an option to modify the number of samples taken for averaging, allowing moving average for transient signals.

@stman
Copy link

stman commented Oct 21, 2018

Hello.

I would like the same functionnality to be implemented : I have looked at the source code, and the "history value" used for the average is a variable whose value is 100.

It would be very handy to have a small input field to be able to change it.

I could do it myself except that I don't code in python, and this is the kind of improvement that will take only 15 minutes for the main developper to implement it and let's say, one hour to do the test and we are done.

Being able to change this value is very important for several applications of Qspectrumanalyzer, particularily for those like me investigating the "Sonic Attacks" of Cuba, with that are the results of the usage of an electromagnetic directed energy weapon, that is not only used in cuba, but everywhere in the world with thousands of victims.

Implementing this functionnality will allow me and many other autonomous investigator to finish our investigations much more quickly and rapidely get rid of false interpretations of the raw data we are caputring about this terrible nazi weapon.

So please, do take these 15 minutes and add this field to change this values, it would be highly appreciated. I am even okay to pay for it the time spent !

Kind regards,

Stman.

@stman
Copy link

stman commented Oct 27, 2020

As I am working on another modification of the code, maybe I am going to implement this functionality myself dear friend. Will let you know.

@RouquinBlanc
Copy link
Author

It does not look like this project is maintained, unfortunately... was a nice one!

@thmang82
Copy link

I did a modification to the code that allows at least temporal smoothing over the last x samples. It' not perfect yet (filter selection is not working right now), but in case you want to give it a try: https://github.com/thmang82/qspectrumanalyzer
I also did some improvements regarding frequency selection ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants