Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor heatmaps #73

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Refactor heatmaps #73

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

dan-knight
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Closes #...

Checklist

  • This PR does NOT contain PHI or germline genetic data. A repo may need to be deleted if such data is uploaded. Disclosing PHI is a major problem.
  • This PR does NOT contain molecular files, compressed files, output files such as images (e.g. .png, .jpeg), .pdf, .RData, .xlsx, .doc, .ppt, or other non-plain-text files. To automatically exclude such files using a .gitignore file, see here for example.
  • I have read the code review guidelines and the code review best practice on GitHub check-list.
  • I have set up or verified the main branch protection rule following the github standards before opening this pull request.
  • The name of the branch is meaningful and well formatted following the standards, using [AD_username (or 5 letters of AD if AD is too long)]-[brief_description_of_branch].
  • I have added the major changes included in this pull request to the CHANGELOG.md under the next release version or unreleased, and updated the date.

Pipeline Run Results

  • Case 1
    • sample:
    • input csv:
    • config:
    • output:
    • log:
  • Case 2
    • sample:
    • input csv:
    • config:
    • output:
    • log:

Analysis Results

  • Case 1
    • script:
    • command:
    • output:
  • Case 2
    • script:
    • command:
    • output:

@dan-knight dan-knight added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2023
@dan-knight dan-knight requested a review from whelena April 5, 2023 06:29
Copy link
Collaborator

@whelena whelena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can make fixes to this PR

left.padding = 1,
right.padding = 1,
resolution = 3000,
width = 9,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want to make the height and width customizable since the H:W ratio depends on the number of samples and mutations


plot.cluster.hm <- function(
cluster.df,
plt.height = 6,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll stick to BPG params to simplify things

legend = list(right = list(
fun = legend.ccf
)),
height = 6,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

height and width should be customizable

@dan-knight
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dan-knight commented Nov 17, 2023

EDIT: Addressed separately in #108

These functions are being picked up as S3 methods for the built-in plot function (which, of course, they aren't). This is just a naming conflict, so I can just change the names to follow BPG'screate.<plot type> standard.

…isualization into danknight-refactor-heatmaps
@dan-knight dan-knight linked an issue Nov 17, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@whelena
Copy link
Collaborator

whelena commented Oct 23, 2024

This PR is split into two PRs to address naming conflicts and standardization of default params

@whelena whelena closed this Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

S3 plot naming conflict
2 participants