Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate multiprocessing into fftvis #29

Open
wants to merge 61 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tyler-a-cox
Copy link
Owner

This PR adds parallel processing to fftvis via the multiprocessing module.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.06494% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.18%. Comparing base (c9a83f6) to head (2785992).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
fftvis/simulate.py 89.16% 6 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
fftvis/utils.py 66.66% 6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
fftvis/beams.py 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #29      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.53%   85.18%   -6.35%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         189      243      +54     
  Branches       44       42       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits          173      207      +34     
- Misses          8       20      +12     
- Partials        8       16       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 85.18% <85.06%> (-6.35%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tyler-a-cox tyler-a-cox marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 05:18
steven-murray and others added 30 commits October 11, 2024 10:54
maint: update to use BeamInterface API
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants