Change unclear errors to specific warning when no packages are specified #137
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am currently using
pacman
while teaching a course on reproducible research and the students find it very helpful - so thank you for this great package. However, novices make creative mistakes that currently result in unclear error messages, while the intended behaviour seems different.Specifically, calling
p_load()
results inError in match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)[[2]] : subscript out of bounds
, whilep_load(character.only = TRUE)
results inError in if (p_loaded(char = package)) { : argument is not interpretable as logical
The intended behaviour of the code seems to be to just return invisible()? In the first set of edits, I enable it to reach that condition. However, it would seem likely that these calls are usually mistakes, so that a warning would be helpful? I have added that in line 58. With this, I hope to be able to make a small contribution - of course, I am happy for you to address this in any other way as well.