Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not consider failures to write files in /sys hard errors #2673

Merged

Conversation

DaanDeMeyer
Copy link
Contributor

systemd-tmpfiles can run in containers, chroots, ... where writing to /sys will fail, so let's suffix these lines with "-" to avoid considering these cases hard errors.

Copy link
Member

@AndreasFuchsTPM AndreasFuchsTPM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a "Signed-off-by:" tag

systemd-tmpfiles can run in containers, chroots, ... where writing to /sys will fail, so let's suffix these lines with "-" to avoid considering these cases hard errors.

Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
@DaanDeMeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added signed off tag

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2673 (c61be2b) into master (86949f7) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2673      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.54%   82.58%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         368      368              
  Lines       42941    42995      +54     
==========================================
+ Hits        35447    35508      +61     
+ Misses       7494     7487       -7     

see 34 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@AndreasFuchsTPM AndreasFuchsTPM merged commit 0632885 into tpm2-software:master Dec 11, 2023
27 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants