-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow overriding passwords generated by extlib #409
Open
coreone
wants to merge
1
commit into
theforeman:master
Choose a base branch
from
broadinstitute:passwords
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you keep it on the line where it used to be? So between
ca_cert_stripped
andca_key_password_file
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is new because
ca_key_password
was not in the parameters for the class previously.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm debating having a default or not. Having it means it ends up in our installer's answer files. Not sure if that's a benefit or a downside. @ehelms?
I also wonder what happens if you change the password parameter. I fear it would break since there's no support to change the password.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a bit confused. I do not like having it as a default and showing up in the answers file. This currently already has a default coming from params.pp?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The diff in GH isn't clear (I also failed at that at first). Right now it's in the body of the class. This PR moves it to a class parameter (with indirection via params since Kafo can't deal with calling functions as defaults).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ehelms can we revisit this? I still think this is a good direction.
I'm still leaning to
undef
and also supportSensitive
. SoVariant[Undef, Sensitive[String[10]], String[10]]] $ca_key_password = undef
(orOptional[Variant[Sensitive[String[10]], String[10]]]
which is equivalent).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, for an existing setup, if a new ca_key_password is provided this will force a new key to be generated, which forces a new CA to be generated which cascades and forces all smart-proxy / Capsules and clients to need to be updated.
Will the code properly handle that? I think we need a test for it. How do we help users not break their installations accidentally?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One data point that just came up today: if puppet-agent is removed then the cache is wiped. If the ssl-build directory isn't wiped, then there's a mismatch. If we have the value as an explicit parameter, the value is stored in the answer file and there wouldn't be an issue. So an argument against
undef
as default and in favor of the current code.