Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #37250 - Ensure js tests are executed on default branch #700

Closed

Conversation

dosas
Copy link
Contributor

@dosas dosas commented Mar 13, 2024

I would like to address the situation that a change in foreman was breaking this plugin and it went unnoticed for nearly two months.

The best way to fix this integration problem would probably be nightly test runs.

This PR suggests to at least run the js tests when a branch is merged into (pushed to) master. This way possible errors are recognized by a failing default branch and development on PRs is not blocked by 'slow' js tests.

What do you think @nofaralfasi @evgeni ?

Obviously this requires #698 to work.

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Mar 13, 2024

I would prefer if we also would run JS tests on every PR, not only those touching webpack.
(people tend to ignore GHA results for pushes)

@dosas
Copy link
Contributor Author

dosas commented Mar 13, 2024

@evgeni also fine with me (y)

@nofaralfasi nofaralfasi self-assigned this Mar 17, 2024
@nofaralfasi
Copy link
Contributor

@dosas can you please update and rebase?

@dosas dosas force-pushed the run-js-tests-for-master-branch branch from 5290b42 to 6ad1d56 Compare March 20, 2024 07:53
@dosas
Copy link
Contributor Author

dosas commented Mar 20, 2024

@dosas can you please update and rebase?

done

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Mar 20, 2024

Node JS 12 tests fail as Core doesn't support Node 12 for a while now ;)

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Mar 20, 2024

As an alternative, how about #701 that utilizes the shared workflow and uses the "right" node versions ;)

@dosas
Copy link
Contributor Author

dosas commented Mar 20, 2024

As an alternative, how about #701 that utilizes the shared workflow and uses the "right" node versions ;)

Fine with me but I think that this is mixing two topics into one commit: One is using shared GHA and the other is when to execute the tests

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Mar 20, 2024

True. We can merge this one and then rebase #701 ontop.

@nofaralfasi ok?

@nofaralfasi
Copy link
Contributor

True. We can merge this one and then rebase #701 ontop.

@nofaralfasi ok?

Yes please

@dosas
Copy link
Contributor Author

dosas commented Mar 20, 2024

@evgeni since #701 was already merged with these changes we can close this, right?

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Mar 20, 2024

I agree

@evgeni evgeni closed this Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants