Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Intel microcode to 2024-09-10 release #241

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: system76
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

crawfxrd
Copy link
Member

Cherry-pick:

  • 148bc36 ("3rdparty/intel-microcode: Update submodule to upstream main")
  • 9dcfad7 ("soc/intel/raptorlake: Fall back to Intel microcode repo")

Ref:

Updating from commit id 2f56505:
2024-08-14 19:59:27 -0600 - (microcode-20240813 Release)

to commit id fbfe741:
2024-09-10 12:02:03 -0600 - (microcode-20240910 Release)

This brings in 1 new commits:
fbfe741 microcode-20240910 Release

Change-Id: If66975c71ade0f08b81fb90d0a91e61ca3405804
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84294
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
With the release 20240910 of the Intel microcode repository, it also
includes the updated microcode file with version 0x129, which makes the
one from the coreboot blobs repo superfluous. Thus, use the one from the
Intel repository again.

Change-Id: I7fb58874719a8373072419e34b3f8923f7db927d
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84295
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
@crawfxrd crawfxrd requested review from a team October 14, 2024 21:07
Copy link
Member

@leviport leviport left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On oryp9 and darp10-b, I tested cold boots, warm reboots, and suspend and resume. All looked good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants