Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bringing the final touches up to documentation #104

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

maxwellflitton
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting this pull request! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.

What is the motivation?

Type of Change

  • 📚 Examples / docs / tutorials / dependencies update
  • 🔧 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🥂 Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • 🚀 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔐 Security fix

What does this change do?

What is your testing strategy?

Is this related to any issues?

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

@tobiemh
Copy link
Member

tobiemh commented Nov 25, 2024

Closing this pull-request as the latest codebase has now been significantly updated, now making use of a native Python with binary communication with remote databases, and support for embedded database usage. The native Python library now has support for custom types, including datetimes, durations, decimals, geojson types, Record IDs, ranges, and tables 🎉.

@tobiemh tobiemh closed this Nov 25, 2024
@tobiemh tobiemh deleted the cleanup branch November 25, 2024 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants