Add k8s docs #23
Add k8s docs #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across various files, primarily focusing on enhancing the documentation in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant KitchenOrdersController
participant IKitchenOrderService
User->>KitchenOrdersController: Update Order Status
KitchenOrdersController->>IKitchenOrderService: Update status
alt Success
KitchenOrdersController-->>User: Status updated successfully
else Failure
KitchenOrdersController-->>User: Error updating status
end
Warning Rate limit exceeded@italopessoa has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs (2)
58-58: Consider optimizing empty line spacing.While spacing between middleware components is good practice, some gaps seem excessive. Consider maintaining single empty lines between related middleware configurations for better readability while avoiding unnecessary vertical spacing.
Also applies to: 75-75, 80-80, 83-83
Line range hint
1-96: Architecture review: Good separation of concerns.The Program.cs maintains clean architecture principles with:
- Clear separation of infrastructure concerns
- Proper dependency registration
- Logical middleware organization
- Centralized error handling
Consider extracting the service configuration into extension methods for better modularity, e.g.,
AddApplicationServices(),AddInfrastructureServices().src/Bmb.Production.Api/Controllers/KitchenOrdersController.cs (2)
Line range hint
52-58: Consider using a standardized error response objectThe current error response in
UpdateStatusreturns a simple string message. Consider using a standardized error response object for consistency across the API.- return new JsonResult("Order status not updated.", new JsonSerializerOptions { WriteIndented = true }) - { - StatusCode = StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError - }; + return StatusCode( + StatusCodes.Status500InternalServerError, + new ErrorResponse + { + Message = "Order status not updated.", + Code = "ORDER_STATUS_UPDATE_FAILED" + });
Line range hint
1-83: Well-structured controller following Clean Architecture principlesThe controller demonstrates good practices:
- Clear separation of concerns
- Proper dependency injection
- Well-documented API endpoints
- Appropriate use of authorization
- REST-compliant endpoints
Consider adding integration tests to verify the authentication and authorization flow.
README.md (1)
61-61: Fix list indentation.The unordered list item is incorrectly indented. It should be indented by 2 spaces to maintain consistency with the markdown style guide.
- - An `OrderStatusChanged` event should be triggered on every status change operation. + - An `OrderStatusChanged` event should be triggered on every status change operation.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
61-61: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
doc/aws-infra-phase-4.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdoc/k8s.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(2 hunks)src/Bmb.Production.Api/Bmb.Production.Api.csproj(2 hunks)src/Bmb.Production.Api/Controllers/KitchenOrdersController.cs(1 hunks)src/Bmb.Production.Api/Extensions/SwaggerExtensions.cs(0 hunks)src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs(4 hunks)src/Bmb.Production.Api/appsettings.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/Bmb.Production.Api/Extensions/SwaggerExtensions.cs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Controllers/KitchenOrdersController.cs (1)
Pattern **/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs (1)
Pattern **/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md
61-61: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/Bmb.Production.Api/appsettings.json (2)
53-53: Verify token expiration requirements
The JWT token expires in 5 minutes (300 seconds). Please verify if this short expiration time meets the business requirements and user experience expectations.
✅ Verification successful
Token expiration time of 5 minutes is appropriate for security
The 5-minute (300 seconds) JWT token expiration is a reasonable security practice for an API serving a kitchen display system. This short-lived token helps minimize the risk window if a token is compromised, while still being practical for the use case where:
- The system is used by kitchen staff who remain logged in during their shift
- The API is accessed by automated clients that can handle token refresh
- The application likely implements automatic token refresh in the background
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for refresh token implementation or token lifecycle management
# Check for refresh token implementation
rg -l 'refresh.*token|token.*refresh' --type cs
# Check for token lifecycle management
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
token $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for token-related configuration and implementation
rg -i "token|jwt" --type cs -A 5
# Search for authentication-related configuration files
fd -e json -x grep -l "token\|jwt\|auth"
# Search for token expiration settings in configuration files
fd -e json -x grep -i "expir"
Length of output: 46860
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JWT configuration and authentication setup
rg -i "jwt|auth" --type cs -A 5 src/Bmb.Production.Api/Configuration/
# Look for any documentation about authentication requirements
fd -e md -x grep -i -A 5 "auth|jwt|token"
# Search for any token-related configuration classes
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtOptions {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 243
54-54: Verify UseAccessToken flag usage
The UseAccessToken flag is enabled. Please ensure this is properly handled in the authentication middleware.
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Bmb.Production.Api.csproj (2)
9-9: LGTM: Product name added
The addition of the Product property provides clear identification for the assembly metadata.
22-22: Verify the impact of package changes
The replacement of Bmb.Auth with Bmb.Tools and removal of Swashbuckle.AspNetCore represent significant changes:
- Authentication functionality might be affected
- API documentation setup needs verification
- Early version (0.0.4) of Bmb.Tools warrants careful testing
Let's verify the changes:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Program.cs file to see how these features are configured.
Package changes appear to be properly integrated
The verification shows that:
- Authentication is properly configured using
Bmb.Tools.Authwith JWT setup (ConfigureJwt) and middleware (UseAuthentication) - Swagger/OpenAPI is correctly set up using
Bmb.Tools.OpenApi(ConfigBmbSwaggerGen,UseSwagger,UseBmbSwaggerUi) - The removed packages' functionalities are now provided by
Bmb.Tools, indicating a consolidation rather than removal of features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of package changes
# Check for any remaining Swagger/OpenAPI setup code
echo "Checking for Swagger/OpenAPI configuration..."
rg -l "Swagger|OpenApi|SwaggerGen" --type cs
# Check for authentication middleware setup
echo "Checking for authentication setup..."
rg -l "UseAuthentication|AddAuthentication|JwtBearer" --type cs
# Check for Bmb.Tools usage
echo "Checking Bmb.Tools usage..."
rg "Bmb.Tools" --type cs
Length of output: 653
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Program.cs content for configuration details
echo "Checking Program.cs configuration..."
cat src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs
Length of output: 2967
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs (2)
5-6: LGTM! Good move towards centralized tooling.
The migration to Bmb.Tools namespace indicates better organization of shared functionality.
48-48: Verify Swagger documentation completeness after migration.
The migration to centralized Swagger configuration looks good, but please ensure all necessary API documentation features are maintained.
Also applies to: 66-66
✅ Verification successful
XML documentation is properly configured for Swagger
The verification shows that:
- XML documentation is configured in Bmb.Production.Api.csproj for both Debug and Release configurations
- Swagger UI is properly set up in Program.cs using the centralized configuration from Bmb.Tools.OpenApi
- No custom operation filters were found, suggesting they were either moved to the centralized package or weren't needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all necessary Swagger documentation features are preserved
# Look for XML documentation file configuration and custom operation filters
# Check for XML documentation in project file
rg -l "GenerateDocumentationFile" --type csproj
# Check for custom operation filters or attributes that might need migration
rg -l "IOperationFilter|SwaggerOperation" --type cs
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for project files and check their content for documentation settings
fd -e csproj -x cat {}
# Search for Swagger-related code in all files
rg -i "swagger|openapi" -A 5 -B 5
# Look for operation filters and attributes without file type restriction
rg "IOperationFilter|SwaggerOperation" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 17834
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Controllers/KitchenOrdersController.cs (2)
Line range hint 22-22: Verify C# version compatibility for primary constructor
The use of primary constructor syntax requires C# 12. Please ensure the project's target framework version supports this feature.
✅ Verification successful
Primary constructor usage is compatible with project configuration
The project is configured with .NET 8.0 and C# 12 (LangVersion), which fully supports primary constructor syntax.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the project's target framework version
cat src/Bmb.Production.Api/Bmb.Production.Api.csproj | grep -E "TargetFramework|LangVersion"
Length of output: 182
7-7: Verify the auth namespace change impact
The change from Bmb.Auth to Bmb.Tools.Auth might affect other parts of the codebase. Let's ensure all references are updated consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Namespace change appears to be consistently applied
The change from Bmb.Auth to Bmb.Tools.Auth has been properly implemented in the KitchenOrdersController.cs. No other files in the codebase are using the old Bmb.Auth namespace, and the BmbRoles references are working correctly with the new namespace. The change appears to be part of a clean migration to the new namespace structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old namespace
rg "using Bmb\.Auth;" --type cs
# Search for references to BmbRoles to ensure they're using the new namespace
rg "BmbRoles\." --type cs -A 2
Length of output: 1203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files using BmbRoles to ensure they have the correct import
fd -e cs -x grep -l "BmbRoles" {} | xargs cat
# Search for any files in the Tools project to verify the namespace
fd -g "Bmb.Tools.Auth/**/*.cs" -x cat {}
Length of output: 3268
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files that might still be using the old namespace
fd -e cs -x grep -l "namespace Bmb.Auth" {}
# Search for any references to the old namespace in project files
fd -e csproj -x grep -l "Bmb.Auth" {}
Length of output: 87
README.md (2)
30-47: LGTM! Well-structured response object.
The JSON structure is clear, consistent, and provides a good example with realistic data.
94-97: Verify the existence and accessibility of diagram files.
The documentation references two diagram files. Let's verify they exist in the correct location.
✅ Verification successful
Both referenced diagram files are present and accessible
The verification confirms that both diagram files exist at their specified locations:
doc/aws-infra-phase-4.pngdoc/k8s.png
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the referenced diagram files exist
echo "Checking for AWS infrastructure diagram..."
if [ -f "doc/aws-infra-phase-4.png" ]; then
echo "AWS diagram exists"
else
echo "AWS diagram not found"
fi
echo "Checking for K8s diagram..."
if [ -f "doc/k8s.png" ]; then
echo "K8s diagram exists"
else
echo "K8s diagram not found"
fi
Length of output: 317
| "JwtOptions": { | ||
| "Issuer": "https://localhost:7000", | ||
| "Audience": "https://localhost:7000", | ||
| "SigningKey": "PkOhRwy6UtniEMo7lLWp3bADctYgnDHCTvH+2YkDeGg=", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Move signing key to secure storage
The JWT signing key should not be stored in plain text in the configuration file. This poses a security risk as it could be exposed through version control or unauthorized access.
Consider:
- Moving the key to Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, or similar secure storage
- Using environment variables for local development
- Implementing key rotation mechanisms
| "Issuer": "https://localhost:7000", | ||
| "Audience": "https://localhost:7000", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use environment-specific configuration for JWT URLs
Hardcoded localhost URLs should be moved to environment-specific configuration files or environment variables.
Consider creating environment-specific settings files:
- appsettings.Development.json
- appsettings.Staging.json
- appsettings.Production.json
src/Bmb.Production.Api/Program.cs
Outdated
|
|
||
| builder.Services.AddControllers() | ||
| .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new JsonStringEnumConverter()); }); | ||
| .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new JsonStringEnumConverter()); }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate JSON configuration.
The AddJsonOptions is called twice with identical configuration. This violates the DRY principle and should be removed.
builder.Services.AddControllers()
- .AddJsonOptions(options => { options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new JsonStringEnumConverter()); });
.AddJsonOptions(options => { options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new JsonStringEnumConverter()); });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -43,37 +58,40 @@ Repository with Kitchen production line resources | |||
| - Status changes cannot be rolled back. | |||
| - If the order status is `Completed`, it should be removed from the orders list. | |||
| - **Events**: | |||
| - An `OrderStatusUpdated` event should be triggered on every status change operation. | |||
| - An `OrderStatusChanged` event should be triggered on every status change operation. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update Gherkin feature files to use consistent event naming
The implementation code correctly uses OrderStatusChanged, but the Gherkin feature files still use the old event name OrderStatusUpdated. Update the following locations:
tests/Bmb.Production.Application.Test/Gherkin/UpdateOrderStatus.feature: "it should publishes a OrderStatusUpdated event"tests/Bmb.Production.Application.Test/Gherkin/PrepareOrder.feature: "it should publishes a OrderStatusUpdated event"tests/Bmb.Production.Application.Test/Gherkin/UpdateOrderStatusSteps.cs: Method name and attribute still using "OrderStatusUpdated"
Note: The step definition in UpdateOrderStatusSteps.cs already uses the correct event internally (OrderStatusChanged), but its method name and attribute need to be updated for consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify event name consistency in the codebase.
The event name has been standardized to OrderStatusChanged throughout the documentation. Let's verify this change is reflected in the implementation.
Also applies to: 69-69, 76-76, 83-83, 90-90
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old event name and verify the new event name usage
echo "Checking for old event name 'OrderStatusUpdated'..."
rg -l "OrderStatusUpdated"
echo "Verifying new event name 'OrderStatusChanged' usage..."
rg -l "OrderStatusChanged"
Length of output: 774
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of files to understand the context better
echo "Checking content of test files with old event name..."
rg -C 2 "OrderStatusUpdated" tests/Bmb.Production.Application.Test/Gherkin/
echo -e "\nChecking implementation files for event usage..."
rg -C 2 "OrderStatusChanged" src/Bmb.Production.Application/
Length of output: 3865
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
61-61: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation
(MD007, ul-indent)
|
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.7 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.