-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add codegen helper for defining operation-specific CustomizableOperation
methods.
#3918
Merged
Velfi
merged 3 commits into
main
from
zhessler-gen-presign-methods-for-presignable-ops-only
Dec 2, 2024
+68
−11
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
33 changes: 33 additions & 0 deletions
33
...smithy/rust/codegen/client/smithy/generators/client/CustomizableOperationImplGenerator.kt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Copyright Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. | ||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.client.smithy.generators.client | ||
|
||
import software.amazon.smithy.model.shapes.OperationShape | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.client.smithy.ClientCodegenContext | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.client.smithy.generators.OperationCustomization | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.client.smithy.generators.OperationSection | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.core.rustlang.RustWriter | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.core.rustlang.rust | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.core.smithy.customize.allCustomizationsAreEmpty | ||
import software.amazon.smithy.rust.codegen.core.smithy.customize.writeCustomizations | ||
|
||
class CustomizableOperationImplGenerator( | ||
private val codegenContext: ClientCodegenContext, | ||
private val operation: OperationShape, | ||
private val customizations: List<OperationCustomization>, | ||
) { | ||
fun render(writer: RustWriter) { | ||
val section = OperationSection.CustomizableOperationImpl(customizations, operation) | ||
// When no customizations are set or there is nothing to write, return early. | ||
if (customizations.isEmpty() || allCustomizationsAreEmpty(customizations, section)) { | ||
return | ||
} | ||
|
||
writer.rust("impl<E, B> CustomizableOperation<#T, E, B> {", codegenContext.symbolProvider.toSymbol(operation)) | ||
writer.writeCustomizations(customizations, section) | ||
writer.rust("}") | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this necessary? If
customizations
is empty then how wouldwriteCustomizations
end up with a "dirty" writer?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question!
How can you tell if the following function will write when called through
RustWriter.writeCustomizations
?It just returns a list of customizations with method implementations. You can't know anything about the implementations, including what sections they actually care about. There's no way to know if this will write anything without actually calling it and trying to write something.
So why is it important to know if something was written? It's important in cases where you want to avoid empty wrappers. Imagine that you want to generate a block of code with functions for converting a type. If you always have
n+1
customizations, then it's always OK to write the enclosing block. But if you only haven
customizations then you'll write an empty block and clippy will be mad at you.Enter
allCustomizationsAreEmpty
. With this function, we can see if anything would actually be written, giving us the power to avoid writing an enclosing block when it would be empty.Does that make sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does, one of my concerns was triggering unrelated/additional side effects (e.g. imports that trigger dependencies being added, etc). We saw this in Kotlin though for a similar but slightly different reason.
Would be nice if we had a cleaner way to do this but I suppose it's fine for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe adding source code comment with an example Rust snippet that this function is trying to solve is useful?