Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing IBM suggested attribute rule #882

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

aireilly
Copy link
Member

@aireilly aireilly commented Sep 12, 2024

The rule that flags "IBM" is too simple and prone to false positives. In general, if a Vale rule is producing false positives, it's not fit for purpose and just adds noise and friction.

"When in doubt, leave it out" 😺

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2024

🎊 Navigate the preview: https://redhat-documentation-vale-at-red-hat-882.surge.sh 🎊

@apinnick
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree. There are too many exceptions.

@apinnick apinnick merged commit 4d5c627 into redhat-documentation:main Sep 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

Change is OK to me. It's very difficult to test these things. I created this rule at the time as I had to crawl the openshift-docs repo to change all instance of IBM names. A rule was a way to flag bad habits of reverting going back to hardcoding IBM names and dropping the RT symbol.

@aireilly
Copy link
Member Author

@dfitzmau all the other work you've done there is good though. Kudos. This one is just too generic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants