Skip to content

quadram-institute-bioscience/dorado-gpu-testing

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

5 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

README

NVIDIA GPUs Testing with dorado

Devices:

  • 01 V100

  • 04 V100

  • 01 L40S

  • 01 A100

  • 01 T4

Input dataset: 80415 Kleb R10 reads

Setting:

  • NB: Environmental setup is not identical for each device because of limited options, particularly the storage, the results thus were affected by this factor.

    • T4 - network storage

    • A100 - network storage

    • L40S - local

    • 4-V100 - local

  • dorado 0.4.3 with three models dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_fast@v4.2.0, dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_hac@v4.2.0, and dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup@v4.2.0

  • Basecalling for each model is replicated with 100 iterations, see scripts

    • benchmark.sh
    • collate-logs.py

Results:

gpu model mean median sd
1-V100 fast 107.939818 107.640500 1.0647929
1-V100 hac 17.202989 17.322450 0.2287823
1-V100 sup 3.571426 3.572158 0.0102934
4-V100 fast 358.610410 359.536300 12.4196079
4-V100 hac 64.213208 64.136780 1.3068442
4-V100 sup 14.203581 14.199730 0.0093489
A100 fast 137.042506 137.969850 3.4711558
A100 hac 53.481533 53.522705 0.5226483
A100 sup 10.811802 10.822560 0.0614872
L40S fast 111.186470 111.214800 0.6627688
L40S hac 40.173250 40.228280 0.3773101
L40S sup 8.314422 8.296941 0.0686721
T4 fast 29.666326 29.523540 0.5780668
T4 hac 6.122082 6.111753 0.0547272
T4 sup 1.010894 1.010712 0.0021719

Million samples/s

The higher the number, the better.

The extreme outliers of the A100 particularly for fast model, may suggest that there were network bottleneck IO.

Generated by Quarto

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Python 79.4%
  • Shell 20.6%