Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated lxml version #209

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

updated lxml version #209

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sumandari
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is to address lxml CVE-2021-28957.

Please be noted that in the dockerize version, we are using defusedxml instead of lxml
\cc @dimasciput

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #209 (c10c412) into master (9d2528d) will increase coverage by 2.49%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #209      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.53%   68.03%   +2.49%     
==========================================
  Files          97       98       +1     
  Lines        3821     3785      -36     
==========================================
+ Hits         2504     2575      +71     
+ Misses       1317     1210     -107     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
qgis-app/plugins/management/__init__.py
qgis-app/lib/__init__.py
qgis-app/base/views/__init__.py
qgis-app/base/forms/__init__.py
qgis-app/plugins/tests/__init__.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qgis-app/users/tests.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qgis-app/userexport/tests.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qgis-app/plugins/tests/test_validator.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qgis-app/plugins/tests/tests.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qgis-app/plugins/validator.py 62.89% <0.00%> (+49.68%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d2528d...c10c412. Read the comment docs.

@timlinux
Copy link
Member

Check if we are still using this dependency and if not remove it rather

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants