Experiment: QuickJS lands in polyscript #57
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
more recent fork: https://github.com/openwebf/quickjs |
|
@bugzpodder I just re-packaged justjake's project as it was unbearable for web standards (TypeScript breaking over CommonJS breaking over fake ESM breaking and so on) but I didn't take any credit and there's no DOM ffi AFAIK so it's half usable but somehow it works ... that's the experiment and I won't work on this for the time being, specially because it has dubious use cases or benefits if realm proposal moves forward. |
WebReflection
force-pushed
the
main
branch
3 times, most recently
from
70c8fea
to
0c44f63
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just a PoC / playground with doubtful usage for the time being but I'll keep it here for fun and history.