Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented QC for three mouse demographic models #1531

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

igronau
Copy link
Contributor

@igronau igronau commented Oct 18, 2023

After a thorough manual inspection of the code, I now implemented the QC for the three demographic models. See #1528.

Copy link
Contributor

@petrelharp petrelharp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!!!

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

I've rebased this so the tests run, but it looks good if the tests pass.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (039df54) 99.85% compared to head (c6aab0d) 99.86%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1531   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.85%   99.86%           
=======================================
  Files         127      128    +1     
  Lines        4260     4300   +40     
  Branches      591      594    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         4254     4294   +40     
  Misses          3        3           
  Partials        3        3           
Files Coverage Δ
stdpopsim/qc/MusMus.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/qc/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@petrelharp petrelharp merged commit 95b3462 into popsim-consortium:main Oct 19, 2023
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants