Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lightning: add precheck that PD and TiDB must belongs to same cluster #57709

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lance6716
Copy link
Contributor

@lance6716 lance6716 commented Nov 26, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #57704

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

lance6716
summarize the file changed of this PR. No need to mention the details like filename or number of lines changed, just from logical and abstract view to write a summary.

Copilot
The changes in PR #57709 for the pingcap/tidb repository include adding a precheck function to ensure that PD and TiDB belong to the same cluster. This new validation logic is integrated into the existing precheck mechanisms within the lightning package.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test: CI failed when I forgot to strip the URL scheme
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Hi @lance6716. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 56.45161% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.7201%. Comparing base (d02d48a) to head (5b29952).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57709        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8318%   73.7201%   +0.8883%     
================================================
  Files          1677       1707        +30     
  Lines        463944     475791     +11847     
================================================
+ Hits         337899     350754     +12855     
+ Misses       105169     103473      -1696     
- Partials      20876      21564       +688     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 46.1493% <56.4516%> (?)
unit 72.2361% <ø> (+0.0123%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 45.1571% <ø> (-0.3541%) ⬇️

@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@lance6716
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 26, 2024

@wuhuizuo: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
@lance6716 lance6716 changed the title [WIP]lightning: add precheck that PD and TiDB must belongs to same cluster lightning: add precheck that PD and TiDB must belongs to same cluster Nov 27, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
return nil, errors.Trace(err)
}

// if intersection is not empty, we can say URLs from TiDB and PD are from the same cluster
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please comment that there will be false positive if user configs a LB address

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-11-27 06:44:31.439505657 +0000 UTC m=+618859.059160172: ☑️ agreed by D3Hunter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

lightning physical should check the TiDB and PD address in config are in the same cluster
3 participants