Convenient reboot for Linux systems with encrypted root partition.
Just type
cryptreboot
instead ofreboot
.
It asks for a passphrase and reboots the system afterward, automatically unlocking the drive on startup using in-memory initramfs patching and kexec. Without explicit consent, no secrets are stored on disk, even temporarily.
Useful when unlocking the drive at startup is difficult, such as on headless and remote systems.
By default, it uses the current kernel command line, /boot/vmlinuz
as kernel
and /boot/initrd.img
as initramfs.
Will work properly when using standard passphrase-based disk unlocking. Fancy methods such as using an external USB with a passphrase file will fail.
LUKS-based disk-encryption configured with /etc/crypttab
file.
Native ZFS encryption with LUKS-encrypted keystore volume.
Currently, cryptreboot depends on initramfs-tools
package which is available in
Debian-based distributions. Therefore one should expect, this tool to work on
Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Pop!_OS, etc.
On the other hand, do not expect it to work on other distributions now. But support for them may come in upcoming versions.
Following distributions were tested by the author on the AMD64 machine:
-
LUKS crypttab disk encryption method
- DappNode 0.2.75 is based on Debian 12, see below
- Debian 12 needs symlinks for kernel and initramfs
- Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS
- Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- Ubuntu 23.04
- Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
- Ubuntu 20.04 LTS needs tiny adjustments to system settings, specifically changing compression and fixing systemd kexec support, but still sometimes reboot experience may be suboptimal
Ubuntu 18.04 LTSis not supported (initramfs uses pre-crypttab format)
-
ZFS keystore disk encryption method
- Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
If you have successfully run cryptreboot on another distribution, please contact me and I will update the list.
You need to ensure those are installed:
ruby
>= 2.7kexec-tools
initramfs-tools
(other initramfs generators, such asdracut
are not supported yet)
If you use recent, mainstream Linux distribution, other requirements are probably already met:
kexec
support in the kernelramfs
filesystem support in kernelcryptsetup
(if you use disk encryption, it should be installed)systemd
or another way to guarantee staged kernel is executed on rebootstrace
(not required if--skip-lz4-check
flag is specified)
If you use Debian-based distribution, use this command to install required packages:
$ sudo apt install --no-install-recommends cryptsetup-initramfs kexec-tools ruby strace systemd
When asked if kexec should handle reboots, answer yes
(however the answer probably
doesn't matter for cryptreboot to work).
Make sure the required software is installed, then install the gem system-wide by executing:
$ sudo gem install crypt_reboot
To upgrade run:
$ sudo gem update crypt_reboot
Cryptreboot performs operations normally only available to the root user, so it is suggested to use sudo or a similar utility.
To perform a reboot type:
$ sudo cryptreboot
To see the usage, run:
$ cryptreboot --help
If you get:
LZ4 compression is not allowed, change the compression algorithm in initramfs.conf and regenerate the initramfs image
it means initramfs was compressed using the LZ4 algorithm, which seems to have issues with concatenating initramfs images.
In case you are 100% sure LZ4 won't cause problems, you can use
--skip-lz4-check
command line flag. This will make the error message
go away, but you risk automatic disk unlocking at startup to fail randomly.
Instead, the recommended approach is to change the compression algorithm
in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
file. Look for COMPRESS
and
set it to some other value such as gzip
(the safe choice), or zstd
(the best compression, but your kernel and initramfs-tools
need to support it).
Here is a one-liner to change compression to gzip
:
$ sudo sed -iE 's/^\s*COMPRESS=.*$/COMPRESS=gzip/' /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
Then you need to regenerate all of your initramfs images:
$ sudo update-initramfs -k all -u
That's it.
Resources related to the issue:
- Appending files to initramfs image - reliable? (StackExchange)
- What is the correct frame format for Linux (Lz4 issue)
- Initramfs unpacking failed (Ubuntu bug report)
If rebooting with cryptreboot doesn't seem to differ from a standard
reboot, it may suggest staged kernel is not being executed by the
systemd
at the end of the shutdown procedure.
The solution I found is to execute kexec -e
instead of
systemctl --force kexec
when the system is ready for a reboot.
To do that systemd-kexec.service
has to be modified.
To make the change minimal, let's use systemd drop-in
for that:
$ sudo mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/systemd-kexec.service.d/
$ echo -e "[Service]\nExecStart=\nExecStart=kexec -e" | sudo tee /etc/systemd/system/systemd-kexec.service.d/override.conf
That should work.
To cancel the change, remove the file:
$ sudo rm /etc/systemd/system/systemd-kexec.service.d/override.conf
By default, cryptreboot looks for kernel in /boot/vmlinuz
and for initramfs
in /boot/initrd.img
. If those files are missing in your Linux distribution,
cryptreboot will fail, unless you use --kernel
and --initramfs
command line
options.
$ sudo cryptreboot --kernel /boot/vmlinuz-`uname -r` --initramfs /boot/initrd.img-`uname -r`
If you don't want to specify options every time you reboot, add symlinks to the currently running kernel and initramfs:
$ cd /boot
$ sudo ln -sf vmlinuz-`uname -r` vmlinuz
$ sudo ln -sf initrd.img-`uname -r` initrd.img
Unfortunately, you need to rerun it after each kernel upgrade, otherwise, cryptreboot is going to boot the old kernel. Upcoming versions of cryptreboot will offer better solutions.
If you get:
Locking error: Failed to lock memory
it means there was an error while locking memory to prevent a risk of sensitive data ending in a swap space.
Make sure you have permission to lock memory. Root users have. If permissions are ok, then please report a bug describing your setup.
The solution of last resort is to use --insecure-memory
flag, which disables memory locking completely.
Ubuntu 20.04 ships with systemd
which may fall back to standard reboot instead of using kexec
, because this utility
is located on a filesystem being unmounted during the shutdown sequence.
As a result, using cryptreboot would feel like using normal reboot.
To tell if your system is affected, you have to check messages printed to the console after you run cryptreboot. This message happens just before reboot, so you will have just a few milliseconds to notice it on screen:
shutdown[1]: (sd-kexec) failed with exit status 1
There is a fix waiting to be included in
a stable release update to systemd
since 2023-07-21.
In the meantime, as a workaround, you can use kexec
directly. Warning: it will skip the standard shutdown procedure. Filesystems won't be unmounted, services won't be stopped, etc. It is like hitting reset
button.
However, when you use a decent filesystem with journalling the risk of things going bad should not be high.
Given the above warning, to reboot skipping the shutdown procedure, run:
$ sudo cryptreboot -p
$ sudo kexec -e # will skip proper shutdown sequence
After checking out the repo, run bundle install
to install
dependencies. Then, run rake spec
to run the tests. You can also
run bin/console
for an interactive prompt that will allow you
to experiment.
To build the gem, run rake build
. To release a new version, update
the version number in version.rb
, and then run rake release
, which
will create a git tag for the version, push git commits and the created
tag, and push the .gem
file to rubygems.org.
Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/phantom-node/cryptreboot. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the code of conduct.
My name is Paweł Pokrywka and I'm the author of cryptreboot.
If you want to contact me or get to know me better, check out my blog.
Thank you for your interest in this project :)
The software is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.
Everyone interacting in the Cryptreboot project's codebases, issue trackers, chat rooms, and mailing lists is expected to follow the code of conduct.