Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update openstack-k8s-operators #216

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

openstack-k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/keystone-operator/api require digest 21a80bc -> b17a4c9
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/common require digest ec81334 -> 5d50a33
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/openstack indirect digest 24529fc -> 5d50a33
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/test require digest 24529fc -> 5d50a33

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@gibizer
Copy link
Collaborator

gibizer commented Jun 21, 2024

@stuggi I think we need some adjustment in the functional test due to the lib-common change openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common@38b791e

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor

stuggi commented Jun 21, 2024

@stuggi I think we need some adjustment in the functional test due to the lib-common change openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common@38b791e

Yes I do a follow up to have a SimulateLoadBalancerServiceIP test helper

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor

stuggi commented Jun 21, 2024

openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#521 , when we have that I'll update the test which uses a LB

@gibizer
Copy link
Collaborator

gibizer commented Jun 21, 2024

openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#521 , when we have that I'll update the test which uses a LB

Merged the helper. Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <mschuppert@redhat.com>
@openstack-k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gibizer, openstack-k8s-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e3f3ea3 into main Jun 21, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants