Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use cifmw_architecture_scenario to set proper automation file #2333

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

raukadah
Copy link
Contributor

@raukadah raukadah commented Sep 10, 2024

openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#375 splits the default vars into different scenario files. We need to fix the reproducer to adapt this change.

This pull-request uses cifmw_architecture_scenario to set proper automation file. It drops cifmw_arch_automation_file params from scenario files.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#394

Note: it excludes zuul.d/architecture-jobs.yaml changes.

Cherry-picked from 07a6146#diff-693e3f6ce03f7b6994b1195bcced3d58c89f1c286667356f827c3aecd4518ef6

openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#375 splits
the default vars into different scenario files. We need to fix the
reproducer to adapt this change.

This pull-request uses cifmw_architecture_scenario to set proper automation file.
It drops cifmw_arch_automation_file params from scenario files.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#375

Note: it excludes zuul.d/architecture-jobs.yaml changes.

Cherry-picked from 07a6146#diff-693e3f6ce03f7b6994b1195bcced3d58c89f1c286667356f827c3aecd4518ef6

Signed-off-by: Chandan Kumar (raukadah) <raukadah@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft September 10, 2024 08:12
Copy link

Thanks for the PR! ❤️
I'm marking it as a draft, once your happy with it merging and the PR is passing CI, click the "Ready for review" button below.

Copy link

This change depends on a change that failed to merge.

Change openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#394 is needed.

@cjeanner
Copy link
Collaborator

recheck

@cjeanner
Copy link
Collaborator

/trigger github-experimental

@rlandy
Copy link
Collaborator

rlandy commented Sep 11, 2024

/trigger github-experimental

@cjeanner
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cjeanner

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 8cec1bb into 18.0.0-proposed Sep 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot deleted the backport_default_split branch September 11, 2024 11:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants