-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Gamma AQ, HT, LT, and HW stress factors to biogenics #139
Conversation
Two ideas/options.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From comparing against MEGANv3 code, it looks like CHW, CHT, and CLT of CARY should be set to 5 (as a sesquiterpene), and that CHW should be additionally set to 5 for all of the monoterpenes as well, including SABI, LIMO, CARE, BPIN, APIN, and MONO.
@MaggieMarvin Thank you for reviewing. Did you make the suggested changes to the pertinent areas of the code in this review? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, sorry! Changes are added here
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
Thank you for reviewing and the suggested changes. I agree with you and have committed the suggestions to the branch. Do you think we need more review and testing, or approve now, and improve later? So far the results you show seem to make the emissions too high comparison to observations? Truly, I do not yet really understand the relationship here. For example, if the past 24-hr minimum temperature drops below threshold, it will boost emissions during the peak later in the day. So far, I have only found a few mentions of how extreme temperatures, wind, or air quality could affect biogenic emissions. Mainly on ozone impacts in the MEGAN 2006 paper, i.e.,"Large increases in the emission of isoprene have been observed from leaves exposed to short-term elevated ozone levels (Velikova et al., 2005). The response occurs rapidly and persists for hours after ozone levels are reduced." This does somewhat correspond to how these factors work, where the daily max/min or AQ will have impacts that persist later into the day. This suggests that larger diurnal fluctuations in the environment should lead to more pronounced emissions, but that's not what Pecorino shows. Also, do we have impacts of ozone on isoprene here? I find really no documentation on these implementations in MEGANv3. Do you find anything else on this? |
These effects do seem to be based on chamber experiments associated with the MEGAN development team (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFM.A33K3319N/abstract ; https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wf58192), with evidence for a delay in monoterpene emissions (https://online.ucpress.edu/elementa/article/10/1/00096/122255/Impact-of-heat-stress-on-foliar-biogenic-volatile). The heat stress response is broadly supported by other recent studies (https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/2683/2023/), though you're probably correct that it really should be PFT-dependent (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010022001998). The influence of ozone on isoprene emissions seems unclear (ozone appears to reduce isoprene emissions in https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/agrmet/73/4/73_D-17-00022/_pdf), but there is no response currently applied in the MEGAN3 implementation. I believe that the code is working as intended - biogenic emissions of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes increase with exposure to extreme stressors (see below for ozone W126 and AQ response for sesquiterpenes and min stress threshold of 20 ppm-hours) - but I'm not sure how broadly the thresholds and emission scaling factors should apply. I think it's ok to include for now since it's based on MEGAN3 and we can turn on/off (maybe set defaults to OFF?), but we should keep an eye out for MEGAN3 documentation and further advancements in the literature. |
Change aq_opt, ht_opt, lt_opt, and hw_opt to default = 1, off.
Changing aq_opt, ht_opt, lt_opt, and hw_opt = 1 (off).
Changing descriptions of aq_opt, ht_opt, lt_opt, and hw_opt regarding default = Off.
Turning aq_opt = 2 (Off) in default namelist.
Setting aq_opt = 2 (Off) by default.
@MaggieMarvin Thank you for these details, as they are very useful for future paper and for improving these (e.g., PFT dependence etc.) later if need be. I have now changed all settings and descriptions for aq_opt, ht_opt, lt_opt, and hw_opt to Off by default. Please go ahead and check. Thank you. After this, I think we have a comprehensive set of factors (with options) that impact and tune the biogenic emissions in canopy-app, and we can see if @quaz115 want's to (or has time to) work on updating the soil moisture factors I have there now. Either way, we can move forward on your work to apply and evaluate canopy-app biogenics and paper! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me! Just one small inconsistency in canopy_readnml.F90 but otherwise I think it's ready to merge
Co-authored-by: Maggie Marvin <47859989+MaggieMarvin@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds commits for the new biogenic stress factors including gamma aq (based on input or constant W126 ozone) and meteorological stress factors for extreme daily high/low temperatures (gamma_ht and gamma_lt) and for extreme high daily wind speeds (gamma_hw).
These are based on MEGAN3...it seems in cases of very high ozone/W126, or in extreme temperatures (high/low) or wind speeds it can lead to increases in biogenic species emissions. The details are in the README, where it is recommended that only the gammaht, gammalt, and gammaws are turned on only when using the historical option on with a simulation longer than 24 hours.
@MaggieMarvin Please test all the options including gamma_aq, ht, lt, and hw with longer historical runs to gauge the increases in some biogenic emissions under extreme AQ or Met conditions.