Add support for syncing block volumes #121
Conversation
awels
force-pushed
the
rsync_server_no_block
branch
from
4bdb6f6
to
0b13e2d
Compare
awels
force-pushed
the
rsync_server_no_block
branch
2 times, most recently
from
20bf851
to
a690774
Compare
|
I fixed the unit test build failure (and also updated go mod tidy like you did) |
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| const ( | ||
| blockrsyncImage = "quay.io/awels/blockrsync:latest" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do you intend to keep the image in your account/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I would love for this to be part of the konveyor organization. I just started the development in my local repo so I could make progress.
| @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ type Transport interface { | |||
| // ServerVolumes returns a list of volumes transfers can add to their server Pods | |||
| ServerVolumes() []v1.Volume | |||
| Direct() bool | |||
| CreateServer(client.Client, endpoint.Endpoint) error | |||
| CreateClient(client.Client, endpoint.Endpoint) error | |||
| CreateServer(client.Client, string, endpoint.Endpoint) error | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what is the need for changing interfaces for prefix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So I needed to create a new stunnel for block syncing since I have a separate server pod. This required a new stunnel/service/route. To identify the difference I added a prefix. This way it is easy to tell which stunnel is for filesystem sync and which one is for block sync.
awels
force-pushed
the
rsync_server_no_block
branch
from
a690774
to
66cb3df
Compare
Right now we only support syncing file volumes. This adds support for block volumes using the blockrsync utility code here: https://github.com/awels/blockrsync This also modifies the transport code to allow a second transport to be used. This is needed because we start a second blockrsync server that needs a different transport to get the routing of data correct. Added unit tests for the transport and rsync code Signed-off-by: Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com>
awels
force-pushed
the
rsync_server_no_block
branch
from
66cb3df
to
8303381
Compare
|
Also note there will be a matching PR in mig-controller that uses the modified interface (with the extra prefix parameter). But I can't create that PR until I have a crane-lib that supports it. |
Right now we only support syncing file volumes.
This adds support for block volumes using the
blockrsync utility code here:
https://github.com/awels/blockrsync
This also modifies the transport code to allow a
second transport to be used. This is needed
because we start a second blockrsync server that
needs a different transport to get the routing of
data correct.
Added unit tests for the transport and rsync code