-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: add grouped ilk emergency spells #10
Open
amusingaxl
wants to merge
33
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
feat/batched-ilk-spells
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,008
−56
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: oddaf <106770775+oddaf@users.noreply.github.com>
amusingaxl
changed the title
Feat: add batched ilk spells
Feat: add batched ilk emergency spells
Nov 25, 2024
amusingaxl
commented
Nov 25, 2024
src/DssBatchedEmergencySpell.sol
Outdated
Comment on lines
31
to
34
/// @dev The min size for the list of ilks | ||
uint256 public constant MIN_ILKS = 2; | ||
/// @dev The max size for the list of ilks | ||
uint256 public constant MAX_ILKS = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically, nothing prevents us from setting MIN_ILKS = 1
and replacing the single-ilk spells with this one. We'd just need to pass a list containing 1 single ilk to the constructor.
amusingaxl
changed the title
Feat: add batched ilk emergency spells
Feat: add grouped ilk emergency spells
Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I decided to remove the hard-coded ilks approach in favor of a more general one which allows us to specify the desired ilks in the constructor.
Regular spells are executed through a
delegatecall
fromMCD_PAUSE_PROXY
. For that reason, they usually should not have storage variables, as they'd be accessing and interacting withMCD_PAUSE_PROXY
's storage, not their own.However, Emergency Spells are not required to interact with
MCD_PAUSE
andMCD_PAUSE_PROXY
at all. They execute actions through regularcall
onMom
contracts, so we don't have this limitation.Even if the contract is somehow misused and used as a regular spell, interacting with
MCD_PAUSE
, there wouldn't be a problem because the storage cannot be changed outside the constructor.This approach requires some amount of hacking due to some Solidity limitations (i.e.: no support for immutable arrays,bytes32 <-> string
conversion shenanigans).While there is still some code duplication,this is significantly reduced compared to the previous approach.