Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👻 Add CSV annotations #324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions bundle/manifests/konveyor-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ metadata:
description: Konveyor is an open-source application modernization platform that
helps organizations safely and predictably modernize applications to Kubernetes
at scale.
features.operators.openshift.io/cnf: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/cni: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/csi: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/disconnected: "true"
features.operators.openshift.io/fips-compliant: "false"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we not designed for fips? Maybe we just need to do the exercise to make sure, but I think we should. @dymurray thoughts?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawn-hurley , I don't know about "designed for", but we've not yet configured downstream to build to run on FIPS enabled clusters. Until that is done, we should continue to claim "false" for its value. Franco has a task configure and build MTA (7.0.z & 7.1.z) for it , but it is lower priority than other efforts around MTA at the moment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW, we're already injecting this in downstream CSV. This PR just brings the change more visibility and the two CSVs closer parity

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heard, I just know that a certain class of customers that we probably want to support will only use fips-compliant stuff, so I want to make sure that we can support those folks. If this is tracked elsewhere, then let's go ahead and ignore this for now :)

features.operators.openshift.io/proxy-aware: "true"
features.operators.openshift.io/tls-profiles: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-aws: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-azure: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-gcp: "false"
olm.skipRange: '>=0.0.0 <99.0.0'
operatorframework.io/initialization-resource: |-
{
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions helm/templates/olm/konveyor-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,6 +11,16 @@ metadata:
description: Konveyor is an open-source application modernization platform that
helps organizations safely and predictably modernize applications to Kubernetes
at scale.
features.operators.openshift.io/disconnected: "true"
features.operators.openshift.io/fips-compliant: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/proxy-aware: "true"
features.operators.openshift.io/cnf: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/cni: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/csi: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/tls-profiles: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-aws: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-azure: "false"
features.operators.openshift.io/token-auth-gcp: "false"
olm.skipRange: '>=0.0.0 <{{ .Values.version }}'
operatorframework.io/initialization-resource: |-
{
Expand Down
Loading