You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The functions get_scientific_name() returns a vector of scientific names for provided vernacular names, within the scope of a package. It does not allow scientific name values:
The current functions are confusing (what is their difference?)
The current functions translate vernacular names to scientific names, but only based on the info that is available in a package. So one could not get a result because the species is not present or (worse) the species is present, but the vernacular name is not included.
The suggested taxonomy()Update get_species() to taxonomy() #115 function provides an overview of taxa that are present in a (filtered) package in a tabular format. That information is easier to scan for existing (and missing) vernacular names that the current functions.
Suggested in camtraptor July 2023 coding sprint
The functions
get_scientific_name()
returns a vector of scientific names for provided vernacular names, within the scope of a package. It does not allow scientific name values:The function
check_species()
returns a vector of scientific names for provided vernacular names and scientific names, within the scope of a package:We think these functions are no longer necessary:
taxonomy()
Updateget_species()
totaxonomy()
#115 function provides an overview of taxa that are present in a (filtered) package in a tabular format. That information is easier to scan for existing (and missing) vernacular names that the current functions.filter_
functions Createfilter_deployments()
,filter_observations()
,filter_media()
camtrapdp#23 allow to search on any column, e.g.scientificName
,vernacularName.nld
etc. Having functions that convert vernacular names to scientific names are less useful here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: