Not completed yet,continuing to work #18
Conversation
学号24050808
Add files via upload
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Go module named Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
SOLECA794/templates/index.tmpl (4)
1-9: Consider improving HTML structure and styling approach.While the basic structure is correct, there are a few areas for improvement:
- The title contains an emoji (☺), which might affect accessibility and professionalism. Consider using plain text instead.
- Inline CSS is used. For better maintainability and separation of concerns, consider moving styles to an external CSS file.
- The
<meta name="viewport">tag is missing, which is important for responsive design on mobile devices.Here's a suggested improvement:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="zh-CN"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> - <title>☺这是一个问答平台</title> - <style> - .oneline{display:inline;} - </style> + <title>这是一个问答平台</title> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css"> </head>And create a separate
styles.cssfile with:.oneline { display: inline; }
10-14: Refine content structure and presentation.The current structure is simple, but there are areas for improvement:
- The subheading "未完待续☹" (Not completed yet) suggests the page is incomplete. This should be removed or replaced with appropriate content for a production environment.
- The reminder section uses inline styling and mixes Chinese and English text. Consider using a more structured approach, such as a list, for better readability and maintainability.
Here's a suggested improvement:
<body> <h1>登录杭电问答平台</h1> -<h2>未完待续☹</h2> -<h4 class="oneline">备忘:</h4> -<p class="oneline">*密码错误提醒*|*忘记密码*|*未注册提示*|*注册查重*|*重置密码*|*页面间身份核验*|</p> +<h2>欢迎使用我们的问答平台</h2> +<h4>功能提示:</h4> +<ul> + <li>密码错误提醒</li> + <li>忘记密码</li> + <li>未注册提示</li> + <li>注册查重</li> + <li>重置密码</li> + <li>页面间身份核验</li> +</ul>This structure is more semantic and easier to style and maintain.
36-41: Simplify sign-up navigation and maintain language consistency.The sign-up section can be improved:
- Instead of using a form for navigation, consider using a simple link or button. This is more semantic and doesn't require a form submission.
- Maintain language consistency with the rest of the page (Chinese).
Here's a suggested improvement:
-<form action="/signup" method="get"> - <p class="oneline">No account? Try to sign up.</p> - <button class="oneline" type="submit">sign up</button> -</form> +<div class="signup-section"> + <p class="oneline">还没有账号？立即注册。</p> + <a href="/signup" class="button">注册</a> +</div> </body> </html>This change simplifies the structure and maintains language consistency. You'll need to style the
.buttonclass in your CSS to make it look like a button if desired.
1-41: Overall assessment and summary of improvementsThis template provides a basic structure for a login page of a Q&A platform. However, several improvements are needed before it's production-ready:
- Security: Implement CSRF protection for forms and use POST method for sensitive operations.
- Consistency: Maintain language consistency throughout the page (either Chinese or English).
- Structure: Improve HTML structure by using semantic elements and moving styles to an external CSS file.
- User Experience: Enhance form labels, error messages, and navigation elements.
- Responsiveness: Add viewport meta tag for better mobile experience.
Please address these points to improve the overall quality and security of the login page.
Consider implementing the following architectural improvements:
- Use a template inheritance system to separate the common layout (header, footer) from page-specific content.
- Implement internationalization (i18n) to support multiple languages easily.
- Use a CSS framework or custom design system for consistent styling across the platform.
- Implement client-side form validation in addition to server-side validation for better user experience.
SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl (2)
6-8: Consider using more specific CSS classes for better maintainability.While the current CSS is functional, using a single "oneline" class for multiple elements might lead to maintainability issues as the template grows. Consider creating more specific classes for different types of inline elements.
For example:
.inline-item { display: inline; } .inline-button { display: inline; margin-left: 5px; } .inline-text { display: inline; margin-right: 10px; }This approach allows for more granular control over the styling of different inline elements.
1-45: Overall improvements needed for security, accessibility, and maintainability.While the template is functional, there are several areas that need attention:
- Security: Implement CSRF protection for the delete functionality.
- Accessibility: Use semantic HTML elements and ARIA attributes as suggested in previous comments.
- Maintainability: Move styles to a separate CSS file and use a configuration file for URLs.
- Error Handling: Improve error handling in the JavaScript function as suggested.
- Internationalization: Consider using a translation framework for text content to support multiple languages.
Next steps:
- Address the issues raised in the individual comments.
- Implement CSRF protection (e.g., include a CSRF token in forms and AJAX requests).
- Create a separate CSS file for styles.
- Set up a configuration system for managing environment-specific values like API URLs.
- Implement proper error handling and user feedback mechanisms.
- Consider adding unit tests for the JavaScript functionality.
These improvements will significantly enhance the security, accessibility, and maintainability of the template.
SOLECA794/templates/signup.tmpl (1)
1-5: Consider improving the page titleThe HTML structure and metadata are correct. However, the title "signing up...." could be more descriptive and in Chinese to match the page content.
Consider changing the title to something more informative, such as:
- <title>signing up....</title> + <title>用户注册 - 我们的网站</title>Also applies to: 14-15, 42-43
SOLECA794/main.go (3)
14-19: Typographical Error: RenameIdentytoIdentityThe field
Identyin theUserstruct is likely intended to beIdentityorRole. Renaming it improves code readability and avoids confusion.Update the struct and all references:
type User struct { ID int Name string Pass []byte Email string - Identy int + Identity int }
115-117: Code Smell: Large Blocks of Commented-Out CodeThere are extensive sections of commented-out code between lines 115-117 and 206-316. Retaining large blocks of unused code can clutter the codebase and make maintenance more difficult.
Consider removing the commented-out code or moving it to a separate branch or documentation if it's needed for future reference.
Also applies to: 206-316
122-124: Redundant Authentication CheckIn the
/homeroute handler, there's an additional check forUserNow.Name == ""after theIsLogmiddleware already handles authentication.This check is redundant and can be removed to simplify the code:
func(c *gin.Context) { - if UserNow.Name == "" { - c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/") - } // Existing code }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- SOLECA794/go.mod (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/main.go (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/home.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/index.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/signup.tmpl (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl (1)
1-5: LGTM: HTML structure and metadata are correct.The HTML5 doctype, language setting, character encoding, and title are all properly defined for a Chinese language web page.
SOLECA794/templates/signup.tmpl (1)
19-19: Clarify the purpose of template variablesThe template uses two variables:
{{ .text }}and{{ .message }}. While their use is syntactically correct, their purpose is not immediately clear.Could you provide more context on what these variables are intended to display? This information would help ensure they're being used appropriately and in the right locations within the template.
Also applies to: 41-41
SOLECA794/go.mod (3)
5-9: Verify versions of direct dependenciesThe direct dependencies seem appropriate for a web application with database access. However, it's important to ensure you're using the latest stable versions for security and feature benefits.
Run the following script to check for the latest versions of the direct dependencies:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the latest versions of direct dependencies echo "Current versions:" grep -E "github.com/gin-gonic/gin|gorm.io/driver/mysql|gorm.io/gorm" SOLECA794/go.mod echo -e "\nLatest versions:" go list -m -versions github.com/gin-gonic/gin | tail -n 1 go list -m -versions gorm.io/driver/mysql | tail -n 1 go list -m -versions gorm.io/gorm | tail -n 1Compare the output with the versions in your
go.modfile and update if necessary.
11-41: Conduct a security audit of dependenciesThe project includes numerous indirect dependencies, which is common when using frameworks like gin and gorm. However, it's crucial to ensure that these dependencies don't introduce any security vulnerabilities.
Run the following script to perform a basic security check using the
govulnchecktool:#!/bin/bash # Description: Perform a basic security check on dependencies # Install govulncheck if not already installed go install golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@latest # Run govulncheck govulncheck ./...Review the output of
govulncheckand address any reported vulnerabilities. For a more comprehensive security audit, consider using additional tools or services specialized in Go dependency scanning.
1-3:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate module name and Go version
Consider using a more specific module name that reflects your project's purpose or organization structure (e.g.,
github.com/yourusername/awesomeproject).The specified Go version (1.23.1) is invalid. As of October 2024, the latest stable version is 1.21.x. Update to a valid version, preferably the latest stable release.
Apply this diff to fix the Go version:
module awesomeProject -go 1.23.1 +go 1.21.5Run the following script to check the latest Go version:
SOLECA794/templates/home.tmpl (4)
77-110: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueImprove question list rendering for better security, UX, and maintainability.
The current implementation of the question list has several areas for improvement:
- The conditional rendering logic could be clearer.
- There are potential XSS vulnerabilities in the way question content is rendered.
- The "TAG : This" and "Manage Mode" could be more descriptive.
- The delete functionality lacks proper security measures.
- The answer functionality is not fully implemented.
Here's a refactored version addressing these issues:
<main> <h2>问题列表</h2> <ul> {{if .K}} <p>用户模式</p> {{range .questions}} <li> <strong>{{.From | html}}</strong>: {{.Content | html}} <form action="/home/{{.ID}}/answer" method="post"> <input type="text" name="answer" required> <button type="submit">回答</button> </form> <a href="/home/{{.ID}}/answers">查看回答</a> </li> {{else}} <li>没有提出问题</li> {{end}} {{else}} <p>管理员模式</p> {{range .questions}} <li id="question-{{.ID}}"> <strong>{{.From | html}}</strong>: {{.Content | html}} <button onclick="deleteQuestion({{.ID}}, '{{.From | js}}')">删除</button> </li> {{else}} <li>没有提出问题</li> {{end}} {{end}} </ul> </main> <script> function deleteQuestion(id, author) { if (!confirm(`确定要删除 ${author} 的问题吗？`)) { return; } // Use the improved deletequestion function from earlier deletequestion(id); } </script>This refactored version:
- Uses more descriptive mode names
- Implements proper HTML escaping to prevent XSS
- Improves the delete confirmation UX
- Structures the answer functionality more clearly
- Uses semantic HTML for better accessibility
To ensure these changes align with the backend expectations and security measures, please verify the following:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the route handlers for answering and viewing answers rg --type python -A 5 "def.*(answer|view_answers)" # Check for any HTML escaping or security measures in the backend rg --type python -A 5 "(escape|sanitize|html)"Consider implementing proper HTML escaping in the backend if not already present. Also, ensure that the delete functionality is properly secured with user authentication and authorization checks.
1-112: Overall assessment and recommendations for improvementThe
home.tmplfile provides a functional template for a question-and-answer platform. However, there are several areas where it can be significantly improved:
- Structure: Separate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript into different files for better maintainability.
- Security: Implement proper HTML escaping to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
- Accessibility: Use semantic HTML elements and ARIA attributes to enhance accessibility.
- User Experience: Improve form layouts, error handling, and user feedback.
- Functionality: Implement the features marked with asterisks (*) or remove them if not planned.
- Internationalization: Consider implementing proper i18n support for multi-language functionality.
- Performance: Optimize JavaScript functions and consider using async loading for non-critical resources.
Next steps:
- Refactor the template into separate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files.
- Implement a robust templating system (if not already in use) to handle dynamic content securely.
- Create a development plan for the unimplemented features (marked with *).
- Conduct a thorough security review, especially for the delete and answer functionalities.
- Implement comprehensive error handling and user feedback mechanisms.
- Consider adopting a frontend framework (e.g., Vue.js, React) for more complex interactions if the application scope is expected to grow.
To ensure a holistic approach to these improvements, please verify the overall project structure and any existing frontend build processes:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing frontend build setup fd -t f "(package.json|webpack.config.js|vite.config.js)" # Look for any existing separate CSS files fd -e css # Check for any existing separate JavaScript files fd -e jsThis will help determine the best approach for separating concerns and improving the overall architecture of the frontend.
34-75: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance main body structure for better accessibility and user experience.
The current structure is functional but can be improved:
- Use semantic HTML5 elements for better structure (e.g.,
<nav>,<main>,<section>).- Improve form accessibility by adding labels and ARIA attributes.
- Consider using a consistent language throughout the interface.
- Clarify the meaning of asterisks (*) for users.
- Group related actions together for better UX.
Here's an example of how you can start improving the structure:
<body> <header> <h1>☺{{.Name}}，欢迎来到杭电问答平台！</h1> </header> <nav> <section> <h2>提问</h2> <form action="/home/new" method="post"> <label for="new-question">请输入你的问题：</label> <input type="text" id="new-question" name="new" required> <button type="submit">添加问题</button> </form> <button aria-label="直接问AI" title="功能尚未实现">✌直接问AI *</button> </section> <section> <h2>查看问题</h2> <form action="/home/my" method="get"> <button type="submit">查看我提出的问题</button> </form> <form action="/home/all" method="get"> <button type="submit">查看所有问题</button> </form> <form action="/home/all" method="get"> <button type="submit">刷新问题</button> </form> </section> <section> <h2>账户管理</h2> <form action="/" method="get"> <button type="submit">退出登录</button> </form> <button aria-label="修改密码" title="功能尚未实现">修改密码 *</button> </section> {{if .V}} <section> <h2>权限申请</h2> <button aria-label="申请" title="功能尚未实现">申请 *</button> </section> {{else}} <section> <h2>管理员功能</h2> <form action="/home/manage" method="get"> <button type="submit">管理回答</button> </form> <form action="home/manage/{{ .ID }}" method="post"> <button type="submit" aria-label="用户管理" title="功能尚未实现">用户管理 *</button> </form> </section> {{end}} </nav> <main> <!-- Question list will go here --> </main> </body>This structure:
- Uses semantic HTML5 elements
- Improves form accessibility
- Groups related actions
- Clarifies unimplemented features with ARIA labels and titles
To ensure these changes align with the backend expectations, please verify the route handlers:
13-32:⚠️ Potential issueImprove the
deletequestionfunction for better robustness and user experience.The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The URL is hardcoded, which is not ideal for maintainability.
- Error handling could be more informative.
- The UI update doesn't handle potential failures.
- There's no confirmation before deletion.
Here's a refactored version addressing these issues:
function deletequestion(id) { if (!confirm('Are you sure you want to delete this question?')) { return; } const apiUrl = '/home/delete'; // Use a relative URL const questionElement = document.getElementById(`question-${id}-1`); const contentElement = document.getElementById(`${id}-2`); fetch(apiUrl, { method: 'DELETE', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, body: JSON.stringify({ id: id }) }) .then(response => { if (!response.ok) { throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); } return response.json(); }) .then(data => { console.log('Question deleted:', data); questionElement.style.textDecoration = "line-through"; contentElement.style.textDecoration = "line-through"; }) .catch(error => { console.error('Error:', error); alert('Failed to delete the question. Please try again.'); }); }This version:
- Adds a confirmation dialog
- Uses a relative URL
- Improves error handling
- Uses
application/jsoncontent type- Provides user feedback on failure
- Only updates UI on successful deletion
To ensure this function works correctly with the backend, please verify the endpoint and expected request format:
| {{$v:=.v}} | ||
| {{if $v }} | ||
| <form action="/reset" method="get"> | ||
| <p class="oneline">忘记密码？尝试重置</p> | ||
| <button class="oneline" type="submit">忘记密码</button> | ||
| </form> | ||
| {{ end }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve password reset functionality and consistency.
The password reset section has some areas for improvement:
- The form uses GET method, which is not recommended for sensitive operations like password reset. Use POST instead.
- The button text is in Chinese while the paragraph is in English. Maintain language consistency.
- The variable name 'v' is not descriptive. Use a more meaningful name.
Here's a suggested improvement:
-{{$v:=.v}}
-{{if $v }}
+{{$showResetOption := .showResetOption}}
+{{if $showResetOption }}
-<form action="/reset" method="get">
+<form action="/reset" method="post">
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="{{ .csrf_token }}">
- <p class="oneline">忘记密码？尝试重置</p>
- <button class="oneline" type="submit">忘记密码</button>
+ <p class="oneline">Forgot password? Try to reset</p>
+ <button class="oneline" type="submit">Reset Password</button>
</form>
{{ end }}This change improves security by using POST method, adds CSRF protection, and maintains language consistency in English (or you could change both to Chinese if that's preferred).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {{$v:=.v}} | |
| {{if $v }} | |
| <form action="/reset" method="get"> | |
| <p class="oneline">忘记密码？尝试重置</p> | |
| <button class="oneline" type="submit">忘记密码</button> | |
| </form> | |
| {{ end }} | |
| {{$showResetOption := .showResetOption}} | |
| {{if $showResetOption }} | |
| <form action="/reset" method="post"> | |
| <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="{{ .csrf_token }}"> | |
| <p class="oneline">Forgot password? Try to reset</p> | |
| <button class="oneline" type="submit">Reset Password</button> | |
| </form> | |
| {{ end }} |
SOLECA794/templates/index.tmpl
Outdated
| <p>{{ .message }}</p> | ||
| <form action="/login" method="post"> | ||
| <label for="username">Username:</label> | ||
| <input type="text" id="username" name="username" required> | ||
| <br> | ||
| <label for="password">Password:</label> | ||
| <input type="password" id="password" name="password" required> | ||
| <br> | ||
| <button type="submit">Login</button> | ||
| <br> | ||
| </form> | ||
| <p>{{ .message2 }}</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance login form security and user experience.
The login form structure is correct, but there are some improvements to be made:
- Add CSRF protection to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
- Consider combining the two message placeholders ({{ .message }} and {{ .message2 }}) into a single, more descriptive message area.
- Add labels for better accessibility.
- Consider adding a "Remember me" option for user convenience.
Here's a suggested improvement:
-<p>{{ .message }}</p>
<form action="/login" method="post">
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="{{ .csrf_token }}">
<label for="username">Username:</label>
<input type="text" id="username" name="username" required>
<br>
<label for="password">Password:</label>
<input type="password" id="password" name="password" required>
<br>
+ <label for="remember">
+ <input type="checkbox" id="remember" name="remember"> Remember me
+ </label>
+ <br>
<button type="submit">Login</button>
<br>
</form>
-<p>{{ .message2 }}</p>
+<div id="message-area">
+ {{ if .message }}
+ <p class="message">{{ .message }}</p>
+ {{ end }}
+</div>Don't forget to implement CSRF token generation and validation on the server side.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <p>{{ .message }}</p> | |
| <form action="/login" method="post"> | |
| <label for="username">Username:</label> | |
| <input type="text" id="username" name="username" required> | |
| <br> | |
| <label for="password">Password:</label> | |
| <input type="password" id="password" name="password" required> | |
| <br> | |
| <button type="submit">Login</button> | |
| <br> | |
| </form> | |
| <p>{{ .message2 }}</p> | |
| <form action="/login" method="post"> | |
| <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="{{ .csrf_token }}"> | |
| <label for="username">Username:</label> | |
| <input type="text" id="username" name="username" required> | |
| <br> | |
| <label for="password">Password:</label> | |
| <input type="password" id="password" name="password" required> | |
| <br> | |
| <label for="remember"> | |
| <input type="checkbox" id="remember" name="remember"> Remember me | |
| </label> | |
| <br> | |
| <button type="submit">Login</button> | |
| <br> | |
| </form> | |
| <div id="message-area"> | |
| {{ if .message }} | |
| <p class="message">{{ .message }}</p> | |
| {{ end }} | |
| </div> |
SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl
Outdated
| <script> | ||
| function deletequestion(id) { | ||
| var questionElement = document.getElementById(`question-${id}`); | ||
| questionElement.style.textDecoration ="line-through"; | ||
| var num=id.toString() | ||
| fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8080/home/delete',{ | ||
| method:'DELETE', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' | ||
| }, | ||
| body: num | ||
| }) | ||
| .then(response => response.json()) | ||
| .then(data => console.log(data)) | ||
| .catch(error => console.error('Error:', error)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and use relative URLs in the delete function.
The deletequestion function has several areas for improvement:
-
Replace the hardcoded URL with a relative path:
fetch('/home/delete', {
-
Handle server responses more robustly:
.then(response => { if (!response.ok) { throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); } return response.json(); }) .then(data => { console.log(data); // Apply strikethrough only after successful deletion questionElement.style.textDecoration = "line-through"; }) .catch(error => { console.error('Error:', error); alert('Failed to delete question. Please try again.'); });
-
Consider refreshing the page or removing the question from the DOM after successful deletion to maintain consistency.
-
Use
constinstead ofvarfor better scoping:const questionElement = document.getElementById(`question-${id}`); const num = id.toString();
These changes will improve error handling, make the code more production-ready, and ensure a more consistent user experience.
SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl
Outdated
| <body> | ||
| <h2>问题列表</h2> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| {{ range .questions}} | ||
| <p class="oneline">●</p> | ||
| <li class="oneline" id="question-{{.ID}}">{{.From}} :</li> | ||
| <p class="oneline">{{.Time}}</p> | ||
| <button onclick="deletequestion({{.ID}})" class="oneline">删除</button> | ||
| <br><ul class="oneline">| {{.Content}}</ul><p class="oneline"> </p><button class="oneline">修改*</button> | ||
| <button class="oneline">查看回答*</button> | ||
| <br><br> | ||
| {{else}} | ||
| <li>没有提出问题</li> | ||
| {{end}} | ||
|
|
||
| </ul> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve HTML structure for better semantics and accessibility.
The current HTML structure can be improved:
-
Use semantic HTML elements for better structure:
<article class="question" id="question-{{.ID}}"> <header> <span class="author">{{.From}}</span> <time datetime="{{.Time}}">{{.Time}}</time> </header> <p class="content">{{.Content}}</p> <footer> <button onclick="deletequestion({{.ID}})">删除</button> <button disabled>修改</button> <button disabled>查看回答</button> </footer> </article>
-
Remove inline styles and use CSS classes instead.
-
Add
disabledattribute to unimplemented buttons instead of using asterisks. -
Use
aria-labelfor non-text content to improve accessibility:<span class="bullet" aria-hidden="true">●</span>
-
Consider using a
<template>element for the empty state:{{if not .questions}} <template id="no-questions"> <p>没有提出问题</p> </template> {{end}}
These changes will improve the semantic structure, accessibility, and maintainability of the HTML.
| <style> | ||
| .oneline{display:inline;} | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider separating CSS for better maintainability
The current CSS serves its purpose, but for better maintainability and scalability, consider moving styles to a separate CSS file.
You could create a separate CSS file and link it in the HTML head:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/styles.css">Then move your styles to this new file:
/* styles.css */
.oneline {
display: inline;
}This approach allows for easier management of styles as your project grows.
| new1 := c.PostForm("new") | ||
| var NewQuestion Question = Question{Content: new1, From: UserNow.Name, Time: time.Now()} | ||
| err := db.Create(&NewQuestion).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "failed"}) | ||
| } | ||
| c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/home/all") | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Error Handling: Missing Error Response
In the /home/new route, if an error occurs while creating a new question, the user receives a JSON error response, but the successful path redirects to a different route.
For consistency, consider providing user-friendly HTML responses for errors or redirecting appropriately.
if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "failed"})
+ c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "error.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Failed to create a new question.",
+ })
return
}
c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/home/all")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| new1 := c.PostForm("new") | |
| var NewQuestion Question = Question{Content: new1, From: UserNow.Name, Time: time.Now()} | |
| err := db.Create(&NewQuestion).Error | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "failed"}) | |
| } | |
| c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/home/all") | |
| }) | |
| new1 := c.PostForm("new") | |
| var NewQuestion Question = Question{Content: new1, From: UserNow.Name, Time: time.Now()} | |
| err := db.Create(&NewQuestion).Error | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "error.tmpl", gin.H{ | |
| "message": "Failed to create a new question.", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/home/all") | |
| }) |
| var questions []Question | ||
| db.Where("`from` = ?", UserNow.Name).Find(&questions) | ||
| //if err != nil { | ||
| // c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "NO QUESTIONS"}) | ||
| //} | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "showmy.tmpl", gin.H{ | ||
| "questions": questions, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Error Handling: Commented-Out Error Check
In the /home/my route, the error check is commented out. If an error occurs, it won't be handled.
Uncomment and update the error handling logic:
db.Where("`from` = ?", UserNow.Name).Find(&questions)
-if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "NO QUESTIONS"})
-}
+if err := db.Where("`from` = ?", UserNow.Name).Find(&questions).Error; err != nil {
+ c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "error.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Failed to retrieve your questions.",
+ })
+ return
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| r.POST("/login", func(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| username := c.PostForm("username") | ||
| password := c.PostForm("password") | ||
| var userLog User | ||
| err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userLog).Error | ||
| if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound { | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "index.tmpl", gin.H{ | ||
| "message": "登录失败！你还没有注册", | ||
| "message2": "没有用户？现在注册一个▼ ▼ ▼", | ||
| "v": 0, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| } else { | ||
| if password != userLog.Pass { | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "index.tmpl", gin.H{ | ||
| "message": "您输入的密码不正确", | ||
| "v": 1, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| } else { | ||
| UserNow = userLog | ||
| c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/home") | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Issue: Plaintext Password Verification
In the login handler, passwords are compared in plaintext, which is insecure and assumes passwords are stored in plaintext.
After hashing passwords during signup, update the login handler to verify hashed passwords:
// In the /login POST handler
-password := c.PostForm("password")
+inputPassword := c.PostForm("password")
// After retrieving userLog from the database
-if password != userLog.Pass {
+if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(userLog.Pass, []byte(inputPassword)); err != nil {
c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "index.tmpl", gin.H{
"message": "Incorrect password",
"v": 1,
})
return
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| if submission == "123321" { | ||
| userSign = User{Name: username, Pass: password, Email: email, Identy: 0} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Issue: Hardcoded Admin Access Code
The admin access code "123321" is hardcoded in the signup logic, which poses a security risk. Anyone with access to the code can register as an admin.
Consider implementing a secure method for admin registration, such as:
- Removing public admin registration entirely.
- Implementing an invitation system.
- Verifying admin status through a secure, out-of-band process.
Update the code to reflect this change:
- if submission == "123321" {
+ if isValidAdminSubmission(submission) {
// Admin registration logic
} else {
// Regular user registration
}Define the isValidAdminSubmission function to handle admin verification securely.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| func main() { | ||
| r := gin.Default() | ||
|
|
||
| dsn := "root:794ASMIN@soleca@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/my_database?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Issue: Hardcoded Database Credentials
The database credentials are hardcoded in the dsn variable, which is insecure and can lead to credential leakage. It's best practice to use environment variables or a configuration file to manage sensitive information.
You can modify the code to read from environment variables:
-import (
+import (
"fmt"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
"gorm.io/driver/mysql"
"gorm.io/gorm"
"io"
"net/http"
"strconv"
"time"
+ "os"
)
func main() {
- dsn := "root:794ASMIN@soleca@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/my_database?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local"
+ dbUser := os.Getenv("DB_USER")
+ dbPassword := os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD")
+ dbHost := os.Getenv("DB_HOST")
+ dbName := os.Getenv("DB_NAME")
+ dsn := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s)/%s?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local",
+ dbUser, dbPassword, dbHost, dbName)Ensure you set the environment variables DB_USER, DB_PASSWORD, DB_HOST, and DB_NAME in your deployment environment.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 27
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
SOLECA794/templates/reset.tmpl (2)
1-6: LGTM! Consider adding viewport meta tag.The HTML structure and head section are well-formed. The charset is correctly set to UTF-8, which is good for internationalization.
Consider adding a viewport meta tag for better responsiveness on mobile devices:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
7-10: Consider internationalization and accessibility improvements.The header text is in Chinese, which might not be accessible to all users if this is an international application. Also, using an
<h1>tag for the main heading is good for accessibility.Consider the following improvements:
- Use a language-neutral identifier for the header and implement proper internationalization.
- Add appropriate ARIA labels for better accessibility.
Example:
<h1 aria-label="Password Reset Interface">{{.header_text}}</h1>SOLECA794/templates/users.tmpl (1)
1-6: Consider improving the title and internationalization.The HTML structure is well-formed, but there are a couple of suggestions for improvement:
The title "Users" is quite generic. Consider using a more descriptive title that reflects the purpose of the page, such as "User Management" or "Admin: User List".
The header text is in Chinese, which suggests this page might be intended for a specific language audience. Consider implementing proper internationalization to support multiple languages.
To implement these suggestions, you could:
- Update the title:
- <title>Users</title> + <title>User Management</title>
- For internationalization, consider using a templating system or a JavaScript-based i18n library to handle translations. This would allow you to easily switch between languages without hardcoding text in the HTML.
Also applies to: 26-28, 38-39
SOLECA794/templates/search.tmpl (2)
1-8: Consider moving inline CSS to a separate file and using more descriptive class names.The HTML structure is correct, but for better maintainability and separation of concerns:
- Move the inline CSS to a separate CSS file.
- Use a more descriptive class name instead of "oneline". For example, "inline-element" would be clearer.
Example refactor:
<head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Search</title> - <style> - .oneline{display: inline;} - </style> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="/path/to/styles.css"> <script>In the separate CSS file:
.inline-element { display: inline; }
1-55: Overall assessment: Functional but needs improvements in structure and best practices.While the template provides the necessary functionality for displaying and managing questions/answers, there are several areas for improvement:
- Separate concerns: Move CSS and JavaScript to external files.
- Enhance JavaScript: Improve error handling, use async/await, and provide better user feedback.
- Improve HTML structure: Use semantic HTML elements and improve accessibility.
- Simplify template logic: Consider moving complex logic to the backend.
- Add pagination: Implement pagination for better handling of large datasets.
- Follow security best practices: Ensure proper input sanitization and XSS prevention.
Implementing these changes will significantly improve the maintainability, scalability, and user experience of the application.
Consider adopting a component-based architecture for your templates. This approach can help in organizing your code better and make it more reusable. For example, you could create separate components for the question list, individual questions, and pagination.
SOLECA794/templates/showanswer.tmpl (1)
1-5: Consider improving language attribute and titleThe HTML structure is correct, but there are two potential improvements:
The
langattribute is set to "zh-CN" (Simplified Chinese). Ensure this matches the actual language of your content. If the content is in English, change it tolang="en".The title "Answers" is quite generic. Consider using a more descriptive title that includes the context, such as "Question Answers" or "User Responses".
SOLECA794/templates/home.tmpl (1)
45-45: Clarify the use of asterisks in button textsThe asterisks (
*) in button texts like"✌直接问AI *","申请成为管理员*", and"用户管理*"might confuse users. If they indicate unimplemented features or special notes, consider providing a tooltip or removing them for clarity.Apply this diff to remove the asterisks:
-<button class="oneline">✌直接问AI *</button> +<button class="oneline">✌直接问AI</button> ... -<button class="oneline">申请成为管理员*</button> +<button class="oneline">申请成为管理员</button> ... -<button type="submit">用户管理*</button> +<button type="submit">用户管理</button>Also applies to: 73-73, 81-81
SOLECA794/main.go (2)
146-149: Redundant Authentication CheckThe check
if UserNow.Name == ""is redundant because theIsLogmiddleware already verifies user authentication and redirects unauthenticated users.Consider removing the redundant check to simplify the code:
func(c *gin.Context) { - if UserNow.Name == "" { - c.Redirect(http.StatusFound, "/") - } v := UserNow.Identy var questions []Question
154-156: Remove Commented-Out Code or Handle Errors ProperlyThe error handling code is commented out. Leaving dead code increases clutter and may cause confusion.
If the error handling is unnecessary, remove it. Otherwise, uncomment and properly handle the error:
-//if err != nil { -// fmt.Println("this") -// c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "NO QUESTIONS"}) -//} +if err := db.Find(&questions).Error; err != nil { + c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "error.tmpl", gin.H{ + "message": "Failed to retrieve questions.", + }) + return +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- SOLECA794/main.go (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/change.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/home.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/index.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/reset.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/search.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/showanswer.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/signup.tmpl (1 hunks)
- SOLECA794/templates/users.tmpl (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- SOLECA794/templates/index.tmpl
- SOLECA794/templates/showmy.tmpl
- SOLECA794/templates/signup.tmpl
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
SOLECA794/templates/change.tmpl (2)
1-5: LGTM: Proper HTML5 structure and metadata.The HTML structure is correct, with appropriate language setting for Simplified Chinese and proper character encoding.
31-39:⚠️ Potential issueImprove form security and usability.
The current form implementation has some security and usability issues that should be addressed:
- The question change form lacks CSRF protection.
- The input field for changing the question doesn't have a proper label, which is bad for accessibility.
- There's no client-side or server-side validation mentioned for the question input.
Consider the following improvements:
Add CSRF token to the form:
<form action="/home/{{ .ID }}/put" method="post"> {{ .CSRFField }} <!-- rest of the form --> </form>Add a proper label for the input field:
<label for="question-input">更改:</label> <input id="question-input" name="change" placeholder="请输入你的问题" required>Implement client-side validation:
<script> function validateForm() { var x = document.forms["changeForm"]["change"].value; if (x == "") { alert("问题不能为空"); return false; } } </script> <form name="changeForm" action="/home/{{ .ID }}/put" method="post" onsubmit="return validateForm()"> <!-- form fields --> </form>Ensure server-side validation is also implemented to sanitize and validate the input.
To verify the implementation of CSRF protection and server-side validation, you can run the following script:
This script will search for common CSRF protection and input validation patterns in the Go backend code.
SOLECA794/main.go (1)
48-48:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity Issue: Hardcoded Database Credentials
The database credentials are hardcoded, which is insecure and can lead to credential leakage. It's best practice to use environment variables or a configuration file to manage sensitive information.
Apply this diff to use environment variables:
+import "os" func main() { - dsn := "root:794ASMIN@soleca@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/my_database?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local" + dbUser := os.Getenv("DB_USER") + dbPassword := os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD") + dbHost := os.Getenv("DB_HOST") + dbName := os.Getenv("DB_NAME") + dsn := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s)/%s?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local", + dbUser, dbPassword, dbHost, dbName)Ensure you set the environment variables
DB_USER,DB_PASSWORD,DB_HOST, andDB_NAMEin your deployment environment.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| <form action="/reset" method="post"> | ||
| <label>验证邮箱:</label> | ||
| <input name="email" required> | ||
| <label>输入新的密码:</label> | ||
| <input name="pass" required> | ||
| <button>确认</button> | ||
|
|
||
| </form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance form security, accessibility, and user experience.
While the form structure is generally correct, there are several areas for improvement:
- Use proper input types and add labels:
<label for="email">验证邮箱:</label> <input type="email" id="email" name="email" required> <label for="password">输入新的密码:</label> <input type="password" id="password" name="pass" required>
- Add client-side validation for password strength.
- Consider adding a password confirmation field.
- Use a more specific name for the password field (e.g., "new_password" instead of "pass").
- Add ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
Example of improved submit button:
<button type="submit" aria-label="Confirm password reset">确认</button>| <form action="/home/all" method="get" class="oneline"> | ||
| <button type="submit" class="oneline">返回首页</button> | ||
| </form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace form with a standard link for homepage navigation.
Using a form for navigation to the homepage is unconventional and may not follow best practices for web usability.
Consider replacing the form with a standard anchor tag:
<a href="/home/all" class="button">返回首页</a>This change will:
- Improve adherence to web standards.
- Enhance usability and accessibility.
- Reduce unnecessary form submissions.
Don't forget to style the anchor to look like a button if that's the desired appearance.
| <style> | ||
| .oneline{display:inline;} | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using external CSS and enhancing styles.
The current CSS is minimal and inline, which may lead to maintenance issues as the application grows. Here are some suggestions:
- Move CSS to an external file for better organization and caching.
- Consider using a CSS framework or creating more comprehensive styles for consistency and improved user experience.
- Use more semantic class names (e.g., "inline-element" instead of "oneline").
Example of moving to an external CSS file:
- Create a file named
styles.cssin your static assets directory. - Move the CSS rule to this file and expand it:
/* styles.css */
.inline-element {
display: inline;
}
/* Add more styles for better presentation */
body {
font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.6;
margin: 0;
padding: 20px;
}
h1 {
color: #333;
}
button {
padding: 5px 10px;
margin: 5px;
cursor: pointer;
}- Link the external CSS in the HTML:
<head>
<!-- ... other meta tags ... -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/styles.css">
<!-- ... -->
</head>- Update class names in your HTML from "oneline" to "inline-element".
| <script> | ||
| function delete(id) { | ||
| var questionElement = document.getElementById(`${id}-1`); | ||
| questionElement.style.textDecoration ="line-through"; | ||
| var num=id.toString() | ||
| fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8080/home/user/delete',{ | ||
| method:'DELETE', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' | ||
| }, | ||
| body: num | ||
| }) | ||
| .then(response => response.json()) | ||
| .then(data => console.log(data)) | ||
| .catch(error => console.error('Error:', error)); | ||
| } | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor the delete function for better practices and error handling.
The current implementation of the delete function has several issues:
- The function name "delete" is a reserved keyword in JavaScript, which can lead to unexpected behavior.
- The URL is hardcoded, which may cause issues in different environments.
- Error handling is minimal, with no user feedback.
- Direct DOM manipulation might not scale well for larger applications.
Here's a suggested refactor to address these issues:
<script>
function deleteUser(id) {
const userElement = document.getElementById(`user-${id}`);
if (!userElement) {
console.error(`User element with id ${id} not found`);
return;
}
const apiUrl = '/api/users/'; // Use relative URL, adjust as needed
fetch(`${apiUrl}${id}`, {
method: 'DELETE',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
})
.then(response => {
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error('Network response was not ok');
}
return response.json();
})
.then(data => {
console.log('User deleted:', data);
userElement.style.textDecoration = "line-through";
// Optionally, remove the element after a delay
setTimeout(() => userElement.remove(), 1000);
})
.catch(error => {
console.error('Error:', error);
alert('Failed to delete user. Please try again.');
});
}
</script>This refactored version:
- Renames the function to avoid using reserved keywords.
- Uses a relative URL for better portability.
- Improves error handling and provides user feedback.
- Centralizes DOM manipulation and uses a more robust approach.
Remember to update the onclick attributes in your HTML to use deleteUser({{.ID}}) instead of delete({{.ID}}).
| <form action="/home/all" method="get" class="oneline"> | ||
| <button type="submit" class="oneline">返回首页</button> | ||
| </form> | ||
| <hr> | ||
| {{ range .User }} | ||
| <li class="oneline" id="{{.ID}}-1">用户: <{{.Name}}> : {{ .Email }}</li> | ||
| <button class="oneline" onclick="delete({{.ID}})">永久封号！</button> | ||
| <hr> | ||
| {{end}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance structure, accessibility, and user experience.
The current implementation of the user list is functional but could be improved:
- The structure could be more semantic and accessible.
- Using inline elements for layout might not be ideal for responsive design.
- The delete functionality lacks confirmation, which could lead to accidental deletions.
Here's a suggested refactor to address these issues:
<h1>用户管理</h1>
<nav>
<a href="/home/all" class="button">返回首页</a>
</nav>
<main>
<ul class="user-list">
{{ range .User }}
<li id="user-{{.ID}}" class="user-item">
<span class="user-info">用户: <strong>{{.Name}}</strong> ({{ .Email }})</span>
<button class="delete-button" onclick="deleteUser({{.ID}})">永久封号</button>
</li>
{{end}}
</ul>
</main>
<script>
// Add this to your existing JavaScript
function deleteUser(id) {
if (confirm('Are you sure you want to delete this user?')) {
// Your existing delete logic here
}
}
</script>This refactored version:
- Uses semantic HTML5 tags for better structure and accessibility.
- Replaces inline styling with classes for better separation of concerns.
- Adds a confirmation step to the delete function to prevent accidental deletions.
- Uses an unordered list for the user entries, which is more appropriate for this type of content.
Remember to update your CSS to style these new classes and elements appropriately.
| er := db.Where("email = ? ", email).First(&userSign).Error | ||
| err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userSign).Error | ||
| if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound && er == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: Overwriting userSign Variable and Error Handling
The userSign variable is reused in two database queries, which can lead to unintended overwriting of data. This might cause logical errors when checking for existing usernames and emails.
Consider separating the queries and using different variables for clarity:
var userByEmail User
var userByName User
-er := db.Where("email = ? ", email).First(&userSign).Error
-err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userSign).Error
+er := db.Where("email = ? ", email).First(&userByEmail).Error
+err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userByName).Error
if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound && er == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound {
// Proceed with signup
} else {
// Handle existing username or email
}This approach prevents data from one query overwriting the other and makes error handling more precise.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| er := db.Where("email = ? ", email).First(&userSign).Error | |
| err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userSign).Error | |
| if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound && er == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound { | |
| var userByEmail User | |
| var userByName User | |
| er := db.Where("email = ? ", email).First(&userByEmail).Error | |
| err := db.Where("name = ? ", username).First(&userByName).Error | |
| if err == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound && er == gorm.ErrRecordNotFound { |
| body, _ := io.ReadAll(c.Request.Body) | ||
| // 将字符串转换为数值 | ||
| receive, _ := strconv.Atoi(string(body)) | ||
| db.Where("id = ?", receive).Delete(&Question{}) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Issue: Reading Request Body Directly
Directly reading the request body using io.ReadAll in a DELETE request can lead to issues. It's better to extract parameters properly.
Modify the handler to parse form data or URL parameters:
-home.DELETE("/question/delete", IsLog, func(c *gin.Context) {
- body, _ := io.ReadAll(c.Request.Body)
- receive, _ := strconv.Atoi(string(body))
+home.POST("/question/delete", IsLog, func(c *gin.Context) {
+ id := c.PostForm("id")
+ receive, err := strconv.Atoi(id)
+ if err != nil {
+ c.HTML(http.StatusBadRequest, "error.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Invalid question ID.",
+ })
+ return
+ }
db.Where("id = ?", receive).Delete(&Question{})
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| body, _ := io.ReadAll(c.Request.Body) | |
| // 将字符串转换为数值 | |
| receive, _ := strconv.Atoi(string(body)) | |
| db.Where("id = ?", receive).Delete(&Question{}) | |
| }) | |
| home.POST("/question/delete", IsLog, func(c *gin.Context) { | |
| id := c.PostForm("id") | |
| receive, err := strconv.Atoi(id) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.HTML(http.StatusBadRequest, "error.tmpl", gin.H{ | |
| "message": "Invalid question ID.", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| db.Where("id = ?", receive).Delete(&Question{}) | |
| }) |
| type User struct { | ||
| ID int | ||
| Name string | ||
| Pass string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Issue: Storing Passwords in Plain Text
The Pass field in the User struct stores passwords as plain text, which poses a significant security risk. Passwords should be hashed using a strong hashing algorithm like bcrypt before being stored.
Apply this diff to hash passwords:
type User struct {
ID int
Name string
- Pass string
+ Pass []byte // Store hashed passwords
Email string
Identy int
}In your signup and reset handlers, hash the password before saving:
+import "golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt"
// In the signup handler
-password := c.PostForm("password")
+password := c.PostForm("password")
+hashedPassword, err := bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(password), bcrypt.DefaultCost)
+if err != nil {
+ c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "signup.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Internal Server Error",
+ })
+ return
+}
-userSign = User{Name: username, Pass: password, Email: email, Identy: identity}
+userSign = User{Name: username, Pass: hashedPassword, Email: email, Identy: identity}In your login handler, compare hashed passwords:
// In the login handler
-password := c.PostForm("password")
+inputPassword := c.PostForm("password")
// After retrieving userLog from the database
-if password != userLog.Pass {
+if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(userLog.Pass, []byte(inputPassword)); err != nil {
c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "index.tmpl", gin.H{
"message": "Incorrect password",
"v": 1,
})
return
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| var ans Answer = Answer{Content: answer, From: UserNow.Name, Quesid: Id, Agree: 0} | ||
| db.Create(&ans) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate User Input to Prevent Empty Answers
When creating a new answer, the input answer is not validated. Users may submit empty content, which could lead to unnecessary records in the database.
Add validation to check if the answer is not empty:
answer := c.PostForm("answer")
+if strings.TrimSpace(answer) == "" {
+ c.HTML(http.StatusBadRequest, "error.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Answer cannot be empty.",
+ })
+ return
+}
var ans Answer = Answer{Content: answer, From: UserNow.Name, Quesid: Id, Agree: 0}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| err := db.Find(&questions).Error | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "NO QUESTIONS"}) | ||
| } | ||
| c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "home.tmpl", gin.H{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Database Errors Appropriately
The error handling for db.Find(&questions) may not be accurate. If no records are found, GORM does not return an error; it returns an empty slice.
Adjust the error handling to catch actual database errors:
err := db.Find(&questions).Error
if err != nil {
- c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "NO QUESTIONS"})
+ c.HTML(http.StatusInternalServerError, "error.tmpl", gin.H{
+ "message": "Database error occurred.",
+ })
+ return
}
+// Optionally, handle the case where 'questions' is empty in your templateCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation