You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm readying some code for possibly working on a DSL2 port at some point, which also includes renaming some of the process names and moving R code into template files; the start of this is on the dev branch. This will affect config files, though at some point we should think about a good base config to store everything in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@grbot I have some fairly significant changes in a branch feature/se-analysis (from dev) that allows (optional, off by default) separate processing of R1 and R2. This need popped up recently with some V3-V4 analyses we have, where the quality of reads at the ends is causing issues with merging. This is also a (surreptitious) lead up to incorporating SE read processing, including 454, etc. I'll likely work on this a bit more to make it more flexible, but will eventually merge it into the dev branch.
The reason I mention all of this: during this work I also made file names a bit more consistent based on whether the analysis is performed on the merged reads, R1, or R2, and whether we are renaming the taxa IDs using MD5 or a simple ('ASV1') naming scheme. This might break some scripts that expect a specific name; I'll try documenting these a bit more in detail prior to merge in case there are any questions.
I'm readying some code for possibly working on a DSL2 port at some point, which also includes renaming some of the process names and moving R code into template files; the start of this is on the
dev
branch. This will affect config files, though at some point we should think about a good base config to store everything in.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: