Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overall name changes #33

Open
cjfields opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Overall name changes #33

cjfields opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
DSL2 Prioritize for DSL2 implementation

Comments

@cjfields
Copy link
Contributor

I'm readying some code for possibly working on a DSL2 port at some point, which also includes renaming some of the process names and moving R code into template files; the start of this is on the dev branch. This will affect config files, though at some point we should think about a good base config to store everything in.

@cjfields
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changing task name to indicate breaking changes

@cjfields cjfields changed the title Process name changes Overall name changes Jan 27, 2022
@cjfields
Copy link
Contributor Author

@grbot I have some fairly significant changes in a branch feature/se-analysis (from dev) that allows (optional, off by default) separate processing of R1 and R2. This need popped up recently with some V3-V4 analyses we have, where the quality of reads at the ends is causing issues with merging. This is also a (surreptitious) lead up to incorporating SE read processing, including 454, etc. I'll likely work on this a bit more to make it more flexible, but will eventually merge it into the dev branch.

The reason I mention all of this: during this work I also made file names a bit more consistent based on whether the analysis is performed on the merged reads, R1, or R2, and whether we are renaming the taxa IDs using MD5 or a simple ('ASV1') naming scheme. This might break some scripts that expect a specific name; I'll try documenting these a bit more in detail prior to merge in case there are any questions.

@cjfields
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, I am very seriously considering re-organizing the output directories, but will do this in a separate branch once these changes are merged in.

@cjfields cjfields added the DSL2 Prioritize for DSL2 implementation label Aug 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DSL2 Prioritize for DSL2 implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant