-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core: protect epoch checksum with its own mutex #2977
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good but trying it out all of my cancels fail.
2024-09-18 08:07:17.441 [INF] CORE: Cancel order d208ee4fa7f536ffb2025bf6c1b31d1fbe9af6c506d3332fb70478ab3cac7e24 targeting order 7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab at 127.0.0.1:17273 has been placed
2024-09-18 08:07:17.441 [DBG] CORE: notify: |POKE| (order) Cancelling order - A cancel order has been submitted for order {{{order|7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab}}} - Order: 7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab
....
2024-09-18 08:07:30.000 [DBG] CORE: Received preimage request for order d208ee4fa7f536ffb2025bf6c1b31d1fbe9af6c506d3332fb70478ab3cac7e24 with known commitment 753dae1f98bd897467f8754912c82533b36612288f448f9dbefb472085a35fe7
2024-09-18 08:07:30.000 [DBG] CORE: async processPreimageRequest for d208ee4fa7f536ffb2025bf6c1b31d1fbe9af6c506d3332fb70478ab3cac7e24 succeeded
2024-09-18 08:07:30.000 [ERR] CORE[wss://127.0.0.1:17273/ws]: No handler found for response: {"type":2,"id":8886,"payload":{"result":null,"error":{"code":45,"message":"preimage hash f655dda0147785bf309308f63fe2c50a548f5ccecd864b91932db04823f23069 does not match order commitment 753dae1f98bd897467f8754912c82533b36612288f448f9dbefb472085a35fe7"}},"sig":""}
2024-09-18 08:07:30.011 [DBG] CORE: Score changed at 127.0.0.1:17273. New score is 13 / 60, tier = 10, penalties = 0
2024-09-18 08:07:30.011 [WRN] CORE: Deleting failed cancel order d208ee4fa7f536ffb2025bf6c1b31d1fbe9af6c506d3332fb70478ab3cac7e24 that targeted trade order 7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab
2024-09-18 08:07:30.013 [WRN] CORE: notify: |WARNING| (order) Failed cancel - Cancel order for order 7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab failed and is now deleted. - Order: 7f0eec29050cd41ed20ce16aa5aec94c08bfb4cf6aeb8ef60b9c483478c078ab
I'm not able to reproduce this at all. I'm running an mm+arb bot with full market swings with and without loadbot sniper. All of my cancels are successful. |
hmm, tried again today. Make a new simnet and new bisonw. Send funds. Make an order then click the |
Yeah I don't know what the heck I was looking at. Should be fixed now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested before and after latest commit.
latest: cancel_logs.zip
Looks good.
* match checksum to separate mutex and add dc cancel tracking
The
trackedTrade.csum
field was protected under the very broadtrackedTrade.mtx
. This created lock contention when preimage requests came in for cancel orders while we had long running ticks, sinceacceptCsum
had to lock that mutex. With this change, we now protect the checksum fields for trades and cancels under a different mutex.Additionally, there were two places where the
trackedTrade.cancel
field was being read unsafely. A solution for that is implemented.Closes #2964
Supercedes #2973