…wal7479/cvat into consensus_testcases

…ow hardware

Fixes cvat-ai#8397

…to gsoc/consensus-feature

…ture

…erge_consensus_jobs

…jobs

… response object

…int as optional

…et to be merged

… response object

…int as optional

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
The restored project in case of testing importing backup was not
deleted.

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->~~
- ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~
- ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~
- ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~
- ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~

### License

- [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated the test case description for clarity regarding project import
functionality.

- **Tests**
- Expanded test coverage to include navigation to the projects list,
project opening attempts, and deletion actions after backup import,
ensuring expected behavior post-restoration.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

…mmon `consensus/create` endpoint

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
As cursor don't turn into pointer so it is very misleading to the end
user. They might confuse whether this is click able button or not. (fix
cvat-ai#8316)

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
Run all test cases also check related UI manually to insure double
check.

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [x] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))
- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))

### License

- [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced user interface by indicating interactivity of the user
dropdown menu with a new pointer cursor style.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Co-authored-by: Kirill Lakhov <kirill.9992@gmail.com>

)

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
This PR adds tests for `management` tab that was introduced in cvat-ai#8329 

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->~~
- ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~
- [x] I have added tests to cover my changes
- ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~
- ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~

### License

- [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Enhanced styling for the Allocation Table and Summary components with
new CSS class names for better visual representation.
- Introduced a new Cypress command for creating jobs, improving the
testing process.
- Added a new testing suite for ground truth management, validating key
functionalities in the management page.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Updated test data for regression tests to ensure accuracy in testing
scenarios.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

When a view returns an `HttpResponseNotFound` object, the `Content-Type`
header is set to `text/html` by default. Therefore, including external data
(in this case, the request ID) in the output without any escaping or
validation leads to a vulnerability. If an attacker can trick a user into
following a malicious link, they can include HTML elements in the request ID
that execute malicious JavaScript code in the victim's browser. That code
will be able to make requests to the CVAT API with the user's privileges.

The simplest fix for this is to not include variable data in the error
message, which is what I did.

In the long run, I think we need to get rid of these HTML responses,
since it doesn't make sense for a JSON API to return HTML.

The default `Content-Type` for `HttpResponse` is `text/html`, so an attacker
can create a label a `<script>` tag inside its name, generate a quality
report, and give a direct link to the `/data` endpoint to a victim user,
causing the script to execute with that user's permission.

Update develop after v2.19.0

…consensus_jobs

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
requests page tests:
The is a potential issue in regression test. As we test 2 exports one by
one, there can be 2 pop-up notifications about successful operation. But
our command cy.closeNotification expects only one. So changed logic a
bit in test so it doesnt crush even if there is several notifications

quality_management tests:
sometimes actions button is not clicked

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->~~
- ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~
- ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~
- ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~
- ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~

### License

- [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved the method for closing the export completion notification on
the requests page for better reliability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->

- Changed chunk generation from per-task chunks to per-segment chunks
- Fixed a memory leak in video reading on the server side (only in
media_extractors, so there are several more left)
- Fixed a potential hang in `import` worker or the server process on
process shutdown
- Disabled multithreading in video reading in endpoints (not in static
chunk generation)
- Refactored static chunk generation code (moved after job creation)
- Refactored various server internal APIs for frame retrieval
- Updated UI logic to access chunks, added support for non-sequential
frames in chunks
- Added a new server configuration option `CVAT_ALLOW_STATIC_CACHE`
(boolean) to enable and disable static cache support. The option is
disabled by default (it's changed from the previous behavior)
- Added tests for the changes made
- Added missing original chunk type field in job responses
- Fixed invalid kvrocks cleanup in tests for Helm deployment
- Added a new 0-based `index` parameter in `GET
/api/jobs/{id}/data/?type=chunk` to simplify indexing
  - GT job chunks with non-sequential frames have no placeholders inside

When this update is applied to the server, there will be a data storage
setting migration for the tasks. Existing tasks using static chunks
(`task.data.storage_method == FILE_SYSTEM`) will be switched to the
dynamic cache (i.e. to `== CACHE)`). The remaining files should be
removed manually, there will be a list of such tasks in the migration
log file.

After this update, you'll have an option to enable or disable static
cache use during task creation. This allows, in particular, prohibit new
tasks using the static cache. With this option, any tasks using static
cache will use the dynamic cache instead on data access.

User-observable changes:
- Job chunk ids now start from 0 for each job instead of using parent
task ids
- The `use_cache = false` or `storage_method = filesystem` parameters in
task creation can be ignored by the server
- Task chunk access may be slower for some chunks (particularly, for
tasks with overlap configured, for chunks on segment boundaries, and for
tasks previously using static chunks)
- The last chunk in a job will contain only the frames from the current
job, even if there are more frames in the task

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))
- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))

### License

- [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new server setting to disable media chunks on the local
filesystem.
- Enhanced frame prefetching with a `startFrame` parameter for improved
chunk calculations.
- Added a new property, `data_original_chunk_type`, for enhanced job
differentiation in the metadata.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Resolved memory management issues to prevent leaks during video
processing.
	- Corrected naming inconsistencies related to the `prefetchAnalyzer`.

- **Documentation**
- Included configuration for code formatting tools to ensure consistent
code quality across the project.

- **Refactor**
- Restructured classes and methods for improved clarity and
maintainability, particularly in media handling and task processing.

- **Chores**
- Updated formatting scripts to include additional directories for
automated code formatting.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

* Fix security issue when anyone could obtain project|task|job|membership details

* Check additional permissions when trying to update task/project target/source storage

Update develop after v2.19.1

…sensus-feature

<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
The task details documentaion page is very outdated. It displays old UI
and some icorrect info

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))
- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))

### License

- [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Documentation**
	- Updated content in the `task-details.md` for improved clarity.
	- Changed image references for better accuracy.
- Clarified terminology regarding job attributes and expanded the
description of the "Assignee."
- Removed outdated references and functionality related to the
"Reviewer" and clipboard copying.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

…ases

# Conflicts:
#	cvat/apps/consensus/serializers.py
#	cvat/apps/consensus/views.py
#	tests/python/shared/assets/annotations.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/cvat_db/cvat_data.tar.bz2
#	tests/python/shared/assets/cvat_db/data.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/jobs.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/labels.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/quality_settings.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/tasks.json

…ticsCard`

…ticsCard`

…to gsoc/consensus-feature

…ture`

…wal7479/cvat into consensus_testcases

… account for `root[0]['x']` vs `root['x]`

…`QualityConflict`

…swagger page