Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor the from_urdf function from RobotLibrary to Robot #437

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yck011522
Copy link
Contributor

This would allow other access to use that function.

What type of change is this?

  • Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
  • Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
  • I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
  • I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
  • I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas_fab.robots.CollisionMesh.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

@@ -110,6 +112,49 @@ def __from_data__(cls, data):
robot.attributes = attributes
return robot

@classmethod
def from_urdf(cls, urdf_filename, srdf_filename=None, local_package_mesh_folder=None, client=None):
# type: (str, Optional[str], Optional[str], Optional[ClientInterface]) -> Robot
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ClientInterface is not imported, is it? Does this work? Can you do a fully-qualified type here (ie. compas_fab.backends.interfaces.ClientInterface) to avoid importing only for the purpose of type checking?

Comment on lines +144 to +148

if srdf_filename:
semantics = RobotSemantics.from_srdf_file(srdf_filename, model)
else:
semantics = None
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this is a bit neater?

Suggested change
if srdf_filename:
semantics = RobotSemantics.from_srdf_file(srdf_filename, model)
else:
semantics = None
semantics = None
if srdf_filename:
semantics = RobotSemantics.from_srdf_file(srdf_filename, model)

Copy link
Member

@gonzalocasas gonzalocasas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm + minor feedback

@jf---
Copy link

jf--- commented Jul 6, 2024

Seems a really cool contribution. Any reason keeping you from merging @yck011522 ?

@yck011522
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems a really cool contribution. Any reason keeping you from merging @yck011522 ?

I'm just slightly away from office these days. Will work on it soon.

@jf---
Copy link

jf--- commented Jul 9, 2024

Happy holidays!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants