Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade rails from 6.1.7.3 to 6.1.7.4 #1086

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jfederico
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
  • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow
SNYK-RUBY-NOKOGIRI-7164639
  768  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@farhatahmad farhatahmad force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from a64bbb9 to 4a57c23 Compare June 27, 2024 19:06
@farhatahmad farhatahmad deleted the snyk-fix-ad37b18f6f6c252db2d6c15e0705fb21 branch November 27, 2024 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants