adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools #1101

gmbronco · 2024-10-24T18:51:14Z

closes #802

changeset-bot · 2024-10-24T18:51:18Z

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 301f5cd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
backend	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

franzns

We should think about how a negative fee and APR affects our UI and if this is what we want to show

franzns · 2024-10-29T09:26:25Z

modules/sources/transformers/swap-v2-transformer.ts

+    // Replica of the subgraph logic:
+    // https://github.com/balancer/balancer-subgraph-v2/blob/60453224453bd07a0a3a22a8ad6cc26e65fd809f/src/mappings/vault.ts#L551-L564
+    if (swap.poolId.poolType === 'FX') {
+        const USDC_ADDRESS = '0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48';


How can we hardcode this? Isnt this different for each chain?

Do we only compare against USDC? No other FOREX such as EURC?

It looks like all the markets are against USDC, but true that it needs to be done for other chains as well.

Hi @franzns, @gmbronco, would it be possible to add a quoteToken property on the Pool model? This new prop will hold the quote token address, whether USDC, USDC.e, or any token.

This is how we assign the quoteToken value in our balancer-subgraph fork:

function handleNewFXPool(event: ethereum.Event, permissionless: boolean): void { ... pool.quoteToken = getFXPoolQuoteToken(poolAddress); ... } function getFXPoolQuoteToken(poolAddress: Address): Bytes { let poolContract = FXPool.bind(poolAddress); // FXPool **always** holds the quote token in the second position let call = poolContract.try_derivatives(BigInt.fromI32(1)); if (call.reverted) { log.error('Failed to get quote token for FXPool: {}', [poolAddress.toHexString()]); return stringToBytes('0x'); } return call.value; }

We then refer to quoteToken instead of hardcoded USDC addresses to determine base and quote:

let isTokenInBase = tokenOutAddress === pool.quoteToken;

Hi @franzns, @gmbronco, would it be possible to add a quoteToken property on the Pool model? This new prop will hold the quote token address, whether USDC, USDC.e, or any token.

This is how we assign the quoteToken value in our balancer-subgraph fork:

function handleNewFXPool(event: ethereum.Event, permissionless: boolean): void { ... pool.quoteToken = getFXPoolQuoteToken(poolAddress); ... } function getFXPoolQuoteToken(poolAddress: Address): Bytes { let poolContract = FXPool.bind(poolAddress); // FXPool **always** holds the quote token in the second position let call = poolContract.try_derivatives(BigInt.fromI32(1)); if (call.reverted) { log.error('Failed to get quote token for FXPool: {}', [poolAddress.toHexString()]); return stringToBytes('0x'); } return call.value; }

We then refer to quoteToken instead of hardcoded USDC addresses to determine base and quote:

let isTokenInBase = tokenOutAddress === pool.quoteToken;

Yes, we should definitely do that. We already have pool type specific data where we can add the quote token. Is the quote token immutable?

Yes, the quote token is immutable for FX pools

I added the quote token to our pool type specifc data set

franzns · 2024-10-29T09:29:12Z

modules/sources/transformers/swap-v2-transformer.ts

+            }
+        }
+
+        feeUSD = String(feeFloatUSD);


Think we talked about the option of a possible negative APR. Would that mean that his fee might be negative? What are the downstream effects if so?

is there upside / downside? i assume it's just a property of FX pools. unless you mean if some other parts of the app will need to be updated. that i'm not sure. Is there anything that depends on the apr?

schystz · 2024-10-31T07:00:47Z

Hi @gmbronco, don't we also need to update how the fees24h is computed in pool.snapshot-service.ts? (note: this file seems to exist in two places)

The code assumes a static pool swap fee, but FX pools have a dynamic swap fee

fees24h: volume24h * parseFloat(poolAtBlock.swapFee)

I'm thinking something like this might work:

fees24h: parseFloat(pool.totalSwapFee) - parseFloat(pool24hAgo.totalSwapFee)

franzns · 2024-10-31T07:10:27Z

Hi @gmbronco, don't we also need to update how the fees24h is computed in pool.snapshot-service.ts? (note: this file seems to exist in two places)

The code assumes a static pool swap fee, but FX pools have a dynamic swap fee
fees24h: volume24h * parseFloat(poolAtBlock.swapFee)
I'm thinking something like this might work:
fees24h: parseFloat(pool.totalSwapFee) - parseFloat(pool24hAgo.totalSwapFee)

Good catch. We'll need to think about that as we'll change the snapshot generation not to rely on subgraph pricing anymore. We can calculate fees24h based on the swap events for example which would be more accurate.

schystz · 2024-10-31T07:14:39Z

Hi @gmbronco, don't we also need to update how the fees24h is computed in pool.snapshot-service.ts? (note: this file seems to exist in two places)
The code assumes a static pool swap fee, but FX pools have a dynamic swap fee
fees24h: volume24h * parseFloat(poolAtBlock.swapFee)
I'm thinking something like this might work:
fees24h: parseFloat(pool.totalSwapFee) - parseFloat(pool24hAgo.totalSwapFee)
Good catch. We'll need to think about that as we'll change the snapshot generation not to rely on subgraph pricing anymore. We can calculate fees24h based on the swap events for example which would be more accurate.

Great, that makes sense to me!

gmbronco · 2024-11-22T10:25:14Z

@franzns this one is ready apart from the snapshot's fees24h, which we don't have in subgraph ATM. (added a separate ticket for it here: #1182)

franzns · 2024-11-28T06:52:57Z

modules/actions/pool/v2/sync-pool-type-onchain-data.ts

+const update = async (data: { id: string; chain: Chain; typeData: any }[]) => {
+    // Update the pool type data
+    const updates = data.map(({ id, chain, typeData }) =>
+        prisma.prismaPool.update({
+            where: { id_chain: { id, chain } },
+            data: { typeData },
+        }),
+    );
+
+    await prismaBulkExecuteOperations(updates, false);
+};


I dont think this works as a general approach. Some pool types will have mutable and immutable type data, meaning some will be synced at creation via subgraph and some will be synced via on-chain in regular intervals.

how does it matter? do you mean to avoid unnecessary update calls?

It actually doesnt really here as you handle FX pools outside of the "update type data flow".

franzns · 2024-11-28T06:55:38Z

modules/sources/enrichers/swaps-usd.ts

-                    valueUSD: String((feeToken?.price || 0) * parseFloat(swap.payload.fee.amount)),
+                    valueUSD: String(feeValueUSD > 0 ? feeValueUSD : swap.payload.fee.valueUSD),


I think you set it to swap.payload.fee.valueUSD because that is still 0 at this time? Think this is a but bogus, just set to 0?

It's a passthrough for a default USD price coming from the subgraph, in case there is no pricing in the DB. It's set earlier and it important to the FX fee, because it's set based on the subgraph data of latestFx rates.

Ah gotcha, this is v2. This is just used as fallback so its fine 👍

franzns reviewed Oct 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

gmbronco force-pushed the adding-dynamic-swap-fee-to-fx-pools branch from dafb09d to 08b5c00 Compare November 20, 2024 17:16

gmbronco added 6 commits November 22, 2024 10:39

adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools

04b54bf

uncommenting

bf13fc8

fixes

84891ac

fx base multichain

e8d56ca

sync FX quote tokens

5131340

using db stored quote tokens for swaps

dbfac77

gmbronco force-pushed the adding-dynamic-swap-fee-to-fx-pools branch from 08b5c00 to dbfac77 Compare November 22, 2024 09:39

gmbronco added 3 commits November 22, 2024 11:01

resolver

6ec01d8

adding missing update

6c57ad2

update refactor

fefc9fb

gmbronco mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024

FX - support dynamic fees24 in snapshots #1182

Open

franzns reviewed Nov 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

Need to set the FX fee in the tokenIn price

301f5cd

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools #1101

adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools #1101

gmbronco commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

franzns left a comment

franzns Oct 29, 2024

franzns Oct 29, 2024

gmbronco Oct 29, 2024

schystz Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading

franzns Oct 31, 2024

schystz Oct 31, 2024

gmbronco Nov 22, 2024

franzns Oct 29, 2024

gmbronco Oct 29, 2024

schystz commented Oct 31, 2024

franzns commented Oct 31, 2024

schystz commented Oct 31, 2024

gmbronco commented Nov 22, 2024

franzns Nov 28, 2024

gmbronco Nov 28, 2024

franzns Nov 28, 2024

franzns Nov 28, 2024

gmbronco Nov 28, 2024

franzns Nov 28, 2024

		valueUSD: String((feeToken?.price \|\| 0) * parseFloat(swap.payload.fee.amount)),
		valueUSD: String(feeValueUSD > 0 ? feeValueUSD : swap.payload.fee.valueUSD),

adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools #1101

Are you sure you want to change the base?

adding dynamic swap fee to fx pools #1101

Conversation

gmbronco commented Oct 24, 2024 • edited Loading

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024 • edited Loading

🦋 Changeset detected

franzns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

schystz Oct 31, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

schystz commented Oct 31, 2024

franzns commented Oct 31, 2024

schystz commented Oct 31, 2024

gmbronco commented Nov 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

gmbronco commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

schystz Oct 31, 2024 •

edited

Loading