Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

新增topic重名可通过配置前缀来区分 #4442

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wangshiwei13363
Copy link

由于历史原因MySQL存在相同库名表名,并且使用的是一套kafka,为了区分监听不同实例下同schema名同表名的表和flink通过前缀动态监听,新增一个前缀区分

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


王世伟 seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

1 similar comment
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


王世伟 seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@agapple
Copy link
Member

agapple commented Nov 16, 2022

  1. 需要和dynamicTopic联动,定义了一些topicName的动态规则,比如默认都加上topicPrefix
  2. 需要同步修改其他几个MQ connector

@O-kai
Copy link

O-kai commented Dec 27, 2022

前缀修饰动态topic这个功能我也挺需要。
我们的场景和楼主差不多:不同服务的mysql数据变动需要定制不同的业务,但是历史原因不同服务的部分 库.表 名字重复了。导致不同服务生产的消息投递到了相同的topic,造成业务处理的混淆。希望可以再加一些topic信息加以区分。期待这个commit可以尽快合入主线。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants