Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix: too many xticks #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2023
Merged

bugfix: too many xticks #89

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2023

Conversation

bch0w
Copy link
Member

@bch0w bch0w commented Feb 27, 2023

Addresses #85

Adds a function to check the order of magnitude of length of trace and dynamically determine the values for xtick major and minor to avoid overwhelming amounts of tick marks on very long traces. Tested with 100s and 84000s data.

Users can still overwrite these values with kwargs xtick_minor and xtick_major

…nd dynamically determine the values for xtick major and minor to avoid overwhelming amounts of tick marks
@bch0w bch0w merged commit 160995a into devel Feb 27, 2023
@bch0w bch0w deleted the bugfix-xticks branch February 27, 2023 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant