-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: cache-control #20
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve an update to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
30-31
: Improve clarity of the cache control documentationThe technical guidance is valuable, but the writing could be clearer. Consider this revision:
-If this data is stale, you can check the `Cache-Control` header of the response from DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry after that amount of time. However, this may cause _significant_ delay if the data is not saved/hydrated in a fully asynchronous or event-based timeframe. +If the data is stale, you can check the `Cache-Control` header in the server's response to determine the appropriate wait time before a retry. While you could implement automatic retries after this wait period, be cautious: this approach may cause _significant_ delays unless the data handling is implemented in a fully asynchronous or event-driven manner.The revision:
- Fixes grammar (adds missing article)
- Breaks the run-on sentence for better readability
- Makes the asynchronous implementation warning more explicit
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~31-~31: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry aft...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~31-~31: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry aft...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
What did you fix?
just cache control docs
Reproduction steps
Evidence/screenshot/link to line
Considerations
Summary by CodeRabbit
Cache-Control
header for optimal retry timing when fetching profile data.