Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: cache-control #20

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: cache-control #20

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

TobiTenno
Copy link
Member

@TobiTenno TobiTenno commented Dec 1, 2024

What did you fix?

just cache control docs


Reproduction steps


Evidence/screenshot/link to line

Considerations

  • Does this contain a new dependency? [No]
  • Does this introduce opinionated data formatting or manual data entry? [No]
  • Does this pr include updated data files in a separate commit that can be reverted for a clean code-only pr? [No]
  • Have I run the linter? [No]
  • Is is a bug fix, feature request, or enhancement? [Docs]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added guidance on handling stale data in the "Example usage" section of the README.md.
    • Included advice on checking the Cache-Control header for optimal retry timing when fetching profile data.

@TobiTenno TobiTenno requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2024 18:46
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve an update to the README.md file, specifically in the "Example usage" section. An additional note has been added to guide users on managing stale data when fetching profile data from the Warframe server. The note emphasizes the importance of checking the Cache-Control header in the server's response to determine the appropriate wait time for retrying fetch operations, while also cautioning about potential delays if the retry mechanism is not implemented asynchronously.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a note in the "Example usage" section regarding handling stale data and checking the Cache-Control header.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A note was added, hip-hip-hooray!
With Cache-Control, we fetch with care,
Stale data woes, now we can beware.
Asynchronous hops, quick and bright,
Fetching profiles, a smooth delight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

30-31: Improve clarity of the cache control documentation

The technical guidance is valuable, but the writing could be clearer. Consider this revision:

-If this data is stale, you can check the `Cache-Control` header of the response from DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry after that amount of time. However, this may cause _significant_ delay if the data is not saved/hydrated in a fully asynchronous or event-based timeframe.
+If the data is stale, you can check the `Cache-Control` header in the server's response to determine the appropriate wait time before a retry. While you could implement automatic retries after this wait period, be cautious: this approach may cause _significant_ delays unless the data handling is implemented in a fully asynchronous or event-driven manner.

The revision:

  • Fixes grammar (adds missing article)
  • Breaks the run-on sentence for better readability
  • Makes the asynchronous implementation warning more explicit
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~31-~31: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry aft...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0dff352 and 97efebb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~31-~31: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...DE's server to see how long to wait for retry, and you could have the above retry aft...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants