Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Are Complex examples specifications? #136

Open
jakebeal opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Are Complex examples specifications? #136

jakebeal opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
ontology
Milestone
SBOL Visual 3.1

Comments

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor

jakebeal commented Dec 1, 2020

The Complex glyph has several "specifications" that are examples of how two other glyphs can be composited. These are only a few of the possible compositions, even if they are particularly common ones.

The ontology currently lists them as specifications, per #133. We should consider more systematically whether this is appropriate and, if so, whether we should be addressing a wider range of combinations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ontology
Projects
None yet
Milestone
SBOL Visual 3.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jamesscottbrown @jakebeal