Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MultiOrthoPoly methods #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2021
Merged

MultiOrthoPoly methods #69

merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2021

Conversation

vavrines
Copy link
Contributor

I'm working on some multivariate polynomials related stuff. Just rearranged the type dispatch in the related functions.

BTW, I noticed that when creating a MultiOrthoPoly, it doesn't inherit the quadrature settings in OrthoPoly or creating a multi-dimensional quadrature. Is there any special consideration for this?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #69 (fa882cd) into master (375d766) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #69   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.87%   73.87%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         869      869           
=======================================
  Hits          642      642           
  Misses        227      227           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/polynomial_chaos.jl 17.44% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 375d766...fa882cd. Read the comment docs.

@timueh
Copy link
Collaborator

timueh commented May 19, 2021

Hi @vavrines, looks fine!

Regarding multivariate integration see #48.

@timueh timueh merged commit b31b86b into SciML:master May 19, 2021
@vavrines vavrines deleted the multipce branch June 2, 2023 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants