Skip to content

Comparison of batch correction methods for scRNA-seq data - basically a clone of BatchBench

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Sarah145/batch_correct

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

22 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Batch correction pipeline

This repository contains scripts to run a Nextflow pipeline to compare different batch correction methods for single-cell RNA-seq data. This is mostly just a clone of the BatchBench pipeline from the CellGen IT team at Sanger but I couldn't get that to run so made some edits and added one or two extra things.

The input files for this pipeline must be .Rds files of the uncorrected data as a SingleCellExperiment object (all batches in one object) with batch labels stored in the batch_key ('Batch' by default) column and cell type labels stored in the celltype_key ('cell_type1' by default) column.

The pipeline will run 7 different batch correction methods on the data:

  • Scanorama
  • BBKNN
  • Seurat 3
  • Combat
  • Harmony
  • limma
  • MNNCorrect

For each method, 5 different evaluation metrics are returned:

  • Batch entropy (from BatchBench) - measure of how well batches are aligned after correction - related to the probability that for each cell, its k nearest neighbors come from a different batch - value reported is average entropy scaled between 0-1 - high batch entropy = well-mixed batches, low batch entropy = poorly-mixed batches.
  • Cell type entropy (from BatchBench) - same as batch entropy but using cell type labels instead - high cell type entropy = mixing of cell types (not good), low cell type entropy = cell types are not mixing (good).
  • Batch ASW (from scIB) - average silhouette width of batches - scaled between -1-1 - high batch ASW = dense, well-separated batches (bad), low batch ASW = well mixed batches (good).
  • Cell type ASW (from scIB) - same as batch ASW but for cell type labels - high cell type ASW = good, low cell type ASW = bad.
  • Recovery of marker genes - this idea was taken from the BatchBench paper but couldn't find code for it so wrote my own - not sure if it's right. For methods that correct the expression matrix (Scanorama, Seurat3, Combat, limma, MNNCorrect), found marker genes for each cell type (by batch and in the merged dataset), before and after batch correction, then compared the list of total marker genes identified before batch correction to the list of total marker genes identified after batch correction and calculated the Jaccard similarity index of the two lists. High Jaccard index = gene expression was not distorted too much by batch correction, most markers genes could still be identified (good), low Jaccard index = batch correction highly distorted the gene expression values so not as many marker genes could be recovered (bad). Jaccard index = 1 - all marker genes recovered, Jaccard index = 0 - no marker genes recovered.

To run pipeline:

  • Need to have Nextflow and Singularity installed.
  • Clone this repo and cd into it.
  • Pull Singularity image - singularity pull shub://Sarah145/batch_correct.
  • Edit the nextflow.config script with location of data, batch key, cell type key, etc. Note: profile section of the nextflow.config script in this repo is configured to run on cluster with slurm.
  • Edit dataset_list.txt file with name of files - one file on each line, no file extension.
  • Run pipeline with nextflow run main.nf -profile singularity -with-trace trace.txt -with-dag flowchart.png.
  • Compile html report of run by running ./compile_report.R <sample_name>.

Overview of pipeline

About

Comparison of batch correction methods for scRNA-seq data - basically a clone of BatchBench

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published