Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Errorfix: DRI H2 and NG demand - NTP and STP mix-up #35

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions inst/extdata/database/tedfs/Tech/Iron Direct Reduction.csv
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,24 +3,24 @@ mode,variable,reference_variable,period,component,value,uncertainty,unit,referen
*,CAPEX,Output Capacity|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,414.0,,EUR_2013,1.0,t/a,"This reference assumes the value provided by Wörtler et al., 2013 but with an additional integration factor of 1.8.",AgoraEnergiewende22,Abbildung 24 and 25
*,CAPEX,Output Capacity|Directly Reduced Iron,2021,#,605.9,,MEUR_2020,1905400.0,t/a,Note that the reference value is not 2 Mt but ~1.9 Mt as per flow data presented in Table 2.,Jacobasch21,"Page 9, Table 6"
*,OPEX Fixed Relative,,2022,#,3.0,,percent,,,,AgoraEnergiewende22,
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,541.0,,m³;norm,1.1,t,"This source states 541 Nm³ of hydrogen per tonne of steel, but does not state how much DRI it assumes per steel. The conversion factor from Devlin et al, 2022 of 1.1 DRI/tSteel is therefore used.",AgoraEnergiewende22,Tabelle 12
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,541.0,,m³;std,1.1,t,"This source states 541 Nm³ of hydrogen per tonne of steel, but does not state how much DRI it assumes per steel. The conversion factor from Devlin et al, 2022 of 1.1 DRI/tSteel is therefore used.",AgoraEnergiewende22,Tabelle 12
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,52.0,,kg,1.1,t,"This source states 52 kg of hydrogen per tonne of semi-finished steel, and 1.1 tonnes of HBI per tonne of semi-finished steel, hence resulting in 52×0.909 kg of hydrogen per tonne of HBI.",Devlin22,Section 2.2.2
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,635.0,,m³;norm,1.0,t,,Holling17,Just before Table 1
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,635.0,,m³;std,1.0,t,,Holling17,Just before Table 1
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,58.17,,kg,1.03,t,This source states 58.17 kg of hydrogen per 1.03 tonnes of iron sponge.,Otto17,Figure 6
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Reduction agent,504.5,20.5,m³;norm,1.0,t,Only the value reported for the hydrogen needed as a reduction agent is mentioned. The remaining hydrogen is instead reported here as heat.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Reduction agent,503.5,21.5,m³;norm,1.0,t,Only the value reported for the hydrogen needed as a reduction agent is mentioned. The remaining hydrogen is instead reported here as heat.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Heat,242.0,,m³;norm,1.0,t,This is the hydrogen not used as a reduction agent but instead as a heat source.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Heat,242.0,,m³;norm,1.0,t,This is the hydrogen not used as a reduction agent but instead as a heat source.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Reduction agent,504.5,20.5,m³;std,1.0,t,Only the value reported for the hydrogen needed as a reduction agent is mentioned. The remaining hydrogen is instead reported here as heat.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Reduction agent,503.5,21.5,m³;std,1.0,t,Only the value reported for the hydrogen needed as a reduction agent is mentioned. The remaining hydrogen is instead reported here as heat.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Heat,242.0,,m³;std,1.0,t,This is the hydrogen not used as a reduction agent but instead as a heat source.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,Heat,242.0,,m³;std,1.0,t,This is the hydrogen not used as a reduction agent but instead as a heat source.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2018,#,51.0,,kg,1.08,t,This source reports its values per tonne of steel. We assume 1.08 tonnes of HBI used per tonne of steel (calculated from 95% Fe2O3 in 1.504 tonnes of iron ore) and divide by that factor.,Vogl18,Section 3
h2,Input|Hydrogen,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2021,#,115742.31,,t,1744694.39,t,,Jacobasch21,"Page 6, Table 2"
h2,Input|Heat,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,0.0,,MWh,1.0,t,This source does not assume any additional heat demand for the direct reduction other than the hydrogen and natural gas used in the process.,AgoraEnergiewende22,
h2,Input|Heat,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,0.45,,MWh,1.1,t,"This source states 0.45 MWh of electricity for H2 heating per tonne of liquid steel, and 1.1 tonnes of HBI per tonne of semi-finished steel, hence resulting in 0.45×0.909 MWh of electricity per tonne of HBI.",Devlin22,Chapter 2.2.2
h2,Input|Heat,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,0.23,,MWh,1.0,t,,Holling17,Just before Table 1
h2,Input|Heat,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,5.62,,GJ,1.03,t,This source states 5.62 GJ of NG demand for heat provision per 1.03 tonnes of iron sponge.,Otto17,Figure 6
h2,Input|Heat,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2018,#,0.286,,MWh,1.08,t,The value 0.286 was read off from the graph and corresponds to the ore heating for 100% HBI. This source reports its values per tonne of steel. We assume 1.08 tonnes of HBI used per tonne of steel (calculated from 95% Fe2O3 in 1.504 tonnes of iron ore) and divide by that factor.,Vogl18,Figure 2
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,50.0,,m³;norm,1.1,t,"This source states 50 Nm³ of natural gas per tonne of steel, but does not state how much DRI it assumes per steel. The conversion factor from Devlin et al, 2022 of 1.1 DRI/tSteel is therefore used.",AgoraEnergiewende22,Tabelle 12
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,#,48.0,,m³;norm,1.0,t,This source assumes a natural-gas demand to provide not only heat but also the carbon content of the DRI.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,#,48.0,,m³;norm,1.0,t,This source assumes a natural-gas demand to provide not only heat but also the carbon content of the DRI.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,50.0,,m³;std,1.1,t,"This source states 50 Nm³ of natural gas per tonne of steel, but does not state how much DRI it assumes per steel. The conversion factor from Devlin et al, 2022 of 1.1 DRI/tSteel is therefore used.",AgoraEnergiewende22,Tabelle 12
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,#,48.0,,m³;std,1.0,t,This source assumes a natural-gas demand to provide not only heat but also the carbon content of the DRI.,Rechenberger20,Section 4.2
h2,Input|Fossil Gas,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2020,#,48.0,,m³;std,1.0,t,This source assumes a natural-gas demand to provide not only heat but also the carbon content of the DRI.,Sasiain20,"Results and Discussion, 8th paragraph"
h2,Input|Electricity,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2022,#,0.065,,MWh,1.1,t,"This source states 0.065 MWh of electricity for H2 compression per tonne of liquid steel, and 1.1 tonnes of HBI per tonne of semi-finished steel, hence resulting in 0.065×0.909 MWh of electricity per tonne of HBI.",Devlin22,Section 2.2.2
h2,Input|Electricity,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,0.08,,MWh,1.0,t,,Holling17,Just before Table 1
h2,Input|Electricity,Output|Directly Reduced Iron,2017,#,0.46,,GJ,1.03,t,This source states 0.46 GJ of electric power per 1.03 tonnes of iron sponge.,Otto17,Figure 6
Expand Down
Loading