Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart #2652

Conversation

xkaper001
Copy link

@xkaper001 xkaper001 commented Nov 21, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Unittest for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

Issue Number:

Fixes #2622

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

image

image

Summary

This PR includes unit tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced new test cases for the OrganizationFeed widget to enhance testing coverage.
      • Verified that the Floating Action Button correctly navigates to the add post screen.
      • Assessed UI behavior when scrolling, ensuring counters reset properly without displaying loading indicators.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two new test cases to the organization_feed_test.dart file, enhancing the test coverage for the OrganizationFeed widget. The tests verify the functionality of the Floating Action Button (FAB) for navigation and the behavior of UI counters during scrolling interactions. These additions aim to ensure correct user interaction handling within the widget.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/... Added two test cases to organization_feed_test.dart: one for FAB navigation and one for counter reset during scrolling.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Achieve 100% test coverage for organization_feed.dart (2622)
Ensure all methods, classes, and functions in the file are tested (2622)
All tests must be valid and truly test the code base (2622)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we play and hop,
With tests for the feed, we’ll never stop!
A button to press, a scroll to explore,
Each click and each swipe opens a door.
So let’s dance with the code, in joy we delight,
For every new test makes our future bright! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

@xkaper001 xkaper001 changed the title Develop postgres Unittests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart Nov 21, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (2)

289-306: Enhance FAB navigation test robustness

While the test covers basic FAB navigation, consider these improvements:

  1. Add when setup for NavigationService mock to handle the navigation call
  2. Verify navigation parameters and return value
  3. Use a more descriptive test name indicating the expected navigation behavior
     testWidgets(
-      'check if FloatingActionButton click works fine',
+      'should navigate to add post screen when FAB is clicked',
       (tester) async {
         // Arrange
         final model = locator<MainScreenViewModel>();
+        when(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen'))
+            .thenAnswer((_) async => true);
         await tester.pumpWidget(createOrganizationFeedScreen(homeModel: model));
         await tester.pumpAndSettle();
         
         // Simulate Tap
         final fabFinder = find.byKey(const Key('floating_action_btn'));
         expect(fabFinder, findsOneWidget);
         await tester.tap(fabFinder);

         // Verify the /addpostscreen is pushed
         await tester.pump();
-        verify(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen'));
+        verify(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen')).called(1);
+        // Verify no other navigation occurred
+        verifyNoMoreInteractions(locator<NavigationService>());
       },
     );

Line range hint 1-328: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios

While the current tests cover basic functionality, consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:

  1. Error scenarios:

    • Network errors during post fetching
    • Empty/invalid responses
    • Error state UI verification
  2. Loading state transitions:

    • State changes during post fetching
    • Loading indicator behavior during pagination
  3. Documentation:

    • Add JSDoc comments for test helper functions
    • Document test data setup and mocking strategy

Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases or create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce1353f and cbbf6d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (1 hunks)

@xkaper001 xkaper001 changed the title Unittests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart Test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart Nov 21, 2024
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 21, 2024
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 21, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests

@xkaper001
Copy link
Author

Done @palisadoes

@palisadoes palisadoes removed their request for review November 23, 2024 21:41
@xkaper001 xkaper001 closed this Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants