-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 467
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
#2652
Test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
#2652
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two new test cases to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (2)
289-306
: Enhance FAB navigation test robustnessWhile the test covers basic FAB navigation, consider these improvements:
- Add
when
setup for NavigationService mock to handle the navigation call- Verify navigation parameters and return value
- Use a more descriptive test name indicating the expected navigation behavior
testWidgets( - 'check if FloatingActionButton click works fine', + 'should navigate to add post screen when FAB is clicked', (tester) async { // Arrange final model = locator<MainScreenViewModel>(); + when(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen')) + .thenAnswer((_) async => true); await tester.pumpWidget(createOrganizationFeedScreen(homeModel: model)); await tester.pumpAndSettle(); // Simulate Tap final fabFinder = find.byKey(const Key('floating_action_btn')); expect(fabFinder, findsOneWidget); await tester.tap(fabFinder); // Verify the /addpostscreen is pushed await tester.pump(); - verify(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen')); + verify(locator<NavigationService>().pushScreen('/addpostscreen')).called(1); + // Verify no other navigation occurred + verifyNoMoreInteractions(locator<NavigationService>()); }, );
Line range hint
1-328
: Enhance test coverage with additional scenariosWhile the current tests cover basic functionality, consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:
Error scenarios:
- Network errors during post fetching
- Empty/invalid responses
- Error state UI verification
Loading state transitions:
- State changes during post fetching
- Loading indicator behavior during pagination
Documentation:
- Add JSDoc comments for test helper functions
- Document test data setup and mocking strategy
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases or create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Please fix the failing tests |
Done @palisadoes |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Unittest for
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Issue Number:
Fixes #2622
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
This PR includes unit tests for
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit