Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run on Bullseye to use pyproj as recommended. #15

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wscherphof
Copy link

Omschrijving

Mapproxy warns in the log that we should use pyproj. Pyproj requires proj >=7.2, which is proj-bin on Bullseye, while on Buster, it's 5.2.

Type verandering

  • Verbetering oude feature

Checklist:

  • [v] Ik heb de code in deze PR zelf nogmaals nagekeken
  • [v] Ik heb mijn code beter achtergelaten dan dat ik het aantrof
  • [v] De code is leesbaar en de moeilijke onderdelen zijn voorzien van commentaar
  • [v] Ik heb de tests toegevoegd/uitgebreid indien nodig
  • [v] Ik heb de tests gedraaid die de werking van mijn wijziging bewijst
  • [v] De PDOK documentatie is bijgewerkt indien nodig.
  • [v] Er zit geen gevoelig informatie in deze PR (wachtwoorden etc)

Mapproxy warns in the log that we should use pyproj.
Pyproj requires proj >=7.2, which is proj-bin on Bullseye,
while on Buster, it's 5.2.
@WouterVisscher
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @wscherphof, thanks for the pull request
We recently created a PR for Mapproxy regarding Azure blobstore mapproxy/mapproxy#608
When mapproxy has new release (tag) we will include your PR for a new release of the PDOK/Mapproxy

@gerdos82 gerdos82 mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2023
7 tasks
@roelarents
Copy link
Collaborator

roelarents commented Jul 11, 2023

bookworm (current debian stable) has proj 9.1. Also fine?
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/proj

Also, we use our common lighttpd image now for mapproxy. So we'll have to upgrade there and also test other uses of that image (e.g. mapserver).

@wscherphof
Copy link
Author

wscherphof commented Jul 11, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants