Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix log_level #2948

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

buzhimingyonghu
Copy link
Contributor

@buzhimingyonghu buzhimingyonghu commented Nov 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved code organization and readability through reordering of include statements.
    • Reformatted logging statements for better clarity in session ID mismatch handling.
    • Changed logging level for slowlog entries from ERROR to INFO.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the PikaReplBgWorker class in src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc. These modifications include reordering include statements for better organization, improving the readability of logging statements in the HandleBGWorkerWriteBinlog and HandleWriteBinlog methods, and minor adjustments to conditional checks in the WriteDBInSyncWay method. The logging level for slowlog entries has also been adjusted. Overall, the changes enhance code readability and organization without affecting functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc - Reordered include statements for better organization.
- Reformatted logging statements for session ID mismatches in HandleBGWorkerWriteBinlog.
- Changed logging level for slowlog entries from ERROR to INFO in HandleWriteBinlog.
- Adjusted conditional checks in WriteDBInSyncWay for clarity.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
We tidy up, we never stop!
With logs that shine and lines so neat,
Our work is done, oh what a treat!
From ERROR to INFO, we cheer,
Code's clearer now, let's give a cheer! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ☢️ Bug Something isn't working Invalid PR Title labels Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc (1)

122-123: Improve log readability further.

While the log formatting is improved, consider using structured logging to make it even more readable and parseable.

-      LOG(WARNING) << "Check SessionId Mismatch: " << slave_db->MasterIp() << ":" << slave_db->MasterPort() << ", "
-                   << slave_db->SyncDBInfo().ToString() << " expected_session: " << binlog_res.session_id()
-                   << ", actual_session:" << slave_db->MasterSessionId();
+      LOG(WARNING) << "Session ID mismatch"
+                   << " master=" << slave_db->MasterIp() << ":" << slave_db->MasterPort()
+                   << " db=" << slave_db->SyncDBInfo().ToString()
+                   << " expected_session=" << binlog_res.session_id()
+                   << " actual_session=" << slave_db->MasterSessionId();
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4820646 and 40792d1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc (6)

100-106: LGTM on DB validation.

Good addition of explicit DB existence checks with appropriate error logging.


174-175: LGTM on monitor message formatting.

The string concatenation is now more readable and efficient.


224-225: LGTM on cache condition formatting.

The condition is now more readable with better line wrapping.


241-242: LGTM on command name check formatting.

The condition is now more readable with better line wrapping.


262-262: LGTM on log level adjustment.

Changing slowlog entries from ERROR to INFO is appropriate as these are informational messages rather than error conditions. This change aligns with the PR's objective of fixing log levels.


9-10: LGTM on include reordering.

The reordering of includes appears to be for better organization. The change looks good, though it's worth ensuring it doesn't impact compilation in different build configurations.

✅ Verification successful

Include order change is safe and well-organized

The verification shows that:

  1. Both header files have proper include guards
  2. There's no circular dependency between these headers
  3. pika_repl_bgworker.h doesn't include pika_conf.h, making the order in the implementation file flexible
  4. Both headers are independent of each other, with their own distinct class definitions

The reordering of includes in src/pika_repl_bgworker.cc is safe and follows good practice.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential include-order related issues
# Look for include guard patterns and potential circular dependencies

rg -l '#include.*pika_(conf|repl_bgworker)\.h' | xargs -I{} rg '#ifndef.*PIKA_(CONF|REPL_BGWORKER)_H_' {}

Length of output: 111


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the header files directly and their include patterns

# First, find the header files
fd -e h 'pika_conf|pika_repl_bgworker' include/

# Then check their content for include guards and includes
echo "=== Content of pika_conf.h ==="
cat include/pika_conf.h | grep -E '#(ifndef|define|include).*'

echo -e "\n=== Content of pika_repl_bgworker.h ==="
cat include/pika_repl_bgworker.h | grep -E '#(ifndef|define|include).*'

Length of output: 1200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if pika_repl_bgworker.h includes pika_conf.h
# and look for any potential circular dependencies

# Check if pika_conf.h is included in pika_repl_bgworker.h
echo "=== Checking if pika_conf.h is included in pika_repl_bgworker.h ==="
rg -l "include.*pika_conf\.h" include/pika_repl_bgworker.h

# Check if any of these files include each other creating a circular dependency
echo -e "\n=== Checking for potential circular dependencies ==="
rg -A 5 "class PikaConf|class PikaReplBgWorker" include/

Length of output: 969

@buzhimingyonghu buzhimingyonghu changed the title fix log_level fix: fix log_level Nov 13, 2024
@Mixficsol Mixficsol merged commit daf6ee4 into OpenAtomFoundation:unstable Nov 13, 2024
11 checks passed
chenbt-hz pushed a commit to chenbt-hz/pika that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☢️ Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants