-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 790
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[15.0][ADD] purchase_reception_status_line #2434
base: 15.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[15.0][ADD] purchase_reception_status_line #2434
Conversation
bb5267f
to
73cfa20
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. What would you think of purchase_line_reception_status
as a module name instead of purchase_reception_status_line
? And please add a test.
Hi @StefanRijnhart, |
@DavidJForgeFlow I guess that makes sense as well. |
73cfa20
to
82d58c4
Compare
@StefanRijnhart tests done! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the tests!
82d58c4
to
3a15e70
Compare
This module works with purchase_reception_status by adding the "force reception" check from the PO to the PO line.
This gives more flexibility when forcing some quantities.
@ForgeFlow