-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][ADD] edi_utm_oca #102
Conversation
d48eb79
to
8f08d7c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As reported on the base PR I don't think we need yet another source discriminator.
We already have endpoint and storage as sources + the types, what else do we need?
Plus, we can leverage UTM for a more general classification... I fail to understand what's the whole point of this.
93b238a
to
8905e1e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also this module should be generic and not related to sales only
8905e1e
to
19cdddd
Compare
19cdddd
to
9a03816
Compare
48fa939
to
b1a2508
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor remarks
b1a2508
to
e26ee0e
Compare
/ocabot merge nobump |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
This PR has the |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 99ad214. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
edi_utm_oca
automatically sets the EDI source on models that have a source_id field when they are created.