Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: memory parquet reader #4962

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

v0y4g3r
Copy link
Contributor

@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r commented Nov 8, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

What's changed and what's your intention?

Enables parquet reader to read from memory files, as pre work for parquet-based memtable.

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Nov 8, 2024
…y ParquetReaderBuilder in tests

 • Remove unnecessary copy in decode_to_batches method of BulkPartEncoder.
 • Streamline ParquetReaderBuilder instantiation in tests by chaining calls and removing intermediate variable.
 • Update documentation comment from "file handle" to "file id" in FileRange.
 • Remove redundant comments and reformat code in ParquetReaderBuilder and Location enums, focusing on functionality changes like enabling inverted and fulltext index checks and
   exposing file path and region id methods.
 Refactor Parquet reader and row group handling in mito2

 - Make `Location` enum public and add async byte fetching method
 - Introduce `RowGroupLocation` to manage row group specific operations
 - Move byte fetching logic from `Sst` to `Location` and `RowGroupLocation`
 - Change `Location` fields and methods to `pub(crate)` for internal use
 - Update `RowGroupReaderBuilder` to use `file_location` instead of `location`
 - Add `fetch_bytes` and cache management methods to `RowGroupLocation`
 - Simplify `InMemoryRowGroup` creation with new `create` method
 - Adjust tests to reflect changes in Parquet reader and row group creation
…nd row group modules

 • Modified decode_to_batches in bulk/part.rs to use placeholders for unused parameters.
 • Enhanced logging in ParquetReader's Drop implementation to include region ID and row group metrics.
 • Added #[allow(dead_code)] to new_memory function in ParquetReaderBuilder.
 • Implemented region_id method in RowGroupReaderBuilder.
 • Added comments to RowGroupLocation methods for clarity.
 • Removed unnecessary comments and unused code.
@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 23:04
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.38356% with 57 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.83%. Comparing base (e373334) to head (6d26697).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4962      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.06%   83.83%   -0.23%     
==========================================
  Files        1142     1143       +1     
  Lines      211510   212114     +604     
==========================================
+ Hits       177801   177826      +25     
- Misses      33709    34288     +579     

@v0y4g3r
Copy link
Contributor Author

v0y4g3r commented Nov 10, 2024

Due to the lacking of keyword generics and we cannot find a workaround currently, this proposal should be abandoned and we can only reused the reader part code be composition.

@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r closed this Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant