Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version bump and changelog entry for previous PR #29

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jannejjj
Copy link
Contributor

@jannejjj jannejjj commented Aug 16, 2024

Pretty straightforward. 😄

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error messages for improved clarity when the Salesforce API encounters issues, aiding in better error handling and user feedback.
  • Version Update

    • Updated the module version to 1.0.2, reflecting improvements and bug fixes without introducing breaking changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery module has been updated to version 1.0.2, released on August 16, 2024. This update focuses on enhancing the ErrorMessage property of the result object to provide clearer, more descriptive error notifications from the Salesforce API, improving user feedback and error handling. The previous version included minor fixes but no new features. Overall, the changes aim to enhance usability and clarity for developers.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/CHANGELOG.md Updated to version 1.0.2; enhanced ErrorMessage for better clarity on API errors.
Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery.csproj Version updated from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2; indicates minor improvements without breaking changes.

Poem

🐰 In the fields of code we hop,
Clarity blooms, we won't stop!
Error messages now so bright,
Guiding users through the night.
With each new change, we cheer and play,
Happy coding, hip-hip-hooray! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jannejjj jannejjj changed the title Version bump and changelog entry for past changes Version bump and changelog entry for previous PR Aug 16, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae5b69c and f4adbd5.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery.csproj (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery.csproj
Additional comments not posted (1)
Frends.Salesforce.ExecuteQuery/CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-5: Changelog entry is clear and concise.

The documentation for version 1.0.2 is well-written and provides a clear description of the change to the ErrorMessage property.

@jannejjj jannejjj requested a review from jefim August 19, 2024 06:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant