Develop Testing naming convetion.

[LuisPH3]

As discussed in #878

I would even go one step further and propose a pattern for the property to tested. Thus, a name should be something like

[TestTarget_SituationUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior]

So, for instance here,

TestSelfDestruct_SuccessfulInvocation_ReturnsSelfdestructedStateAndConsumesGas

This might be a bit long, but I think it documents well what this test does. In contrast, a test checking for failure states would be named like

TestSelfDestruct_InsufficientGas_ReturnsStopStateAndError

If the SituationUnderTest is obvious, it may be omitted.

Originally posted by @HerbertJordan in #878 (comment)