Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Requirment: Simplify and improve record start time #21

Open
krischer opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 15 comments
Open

Requirment: Simplify and improve record start time #21

krischer opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 15 comments

Comments

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor

krischer commented Jan 3, 2018

Simplification of MiniSEED2: Simplify and improve record start time.

@crotwell
Copy link

crotwell commented Jan 8, 2018

Is this different from #6 ?

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

krischer commented Jan 8, 2018

I guess this requirement refers to the fact that the actual start time in miniSEED2 can be modified in a number of way by other fields in the fixed header or various blockettes so in that sense it is independent of the way the numeric value of the absolute times is represented.

@chad-earthscope
Copy link
Member

I think this is also partially a remnant of the "UNIX/Posix based epoch" time that was in the original strawman. That concept resulted in strong opposition by D. Neuhauser (who proposed the extended time structure) and J. Steim.

@crotwell
Copy link

crotwell commented Jan 8, 2018

So the simplify step is to make it no longer modified (ie time correction always applied), and the improve is to add nanos?

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

krischer commented Jan 8, 2018

That is how I would interpret it but I don't know exactly where this requirement originates from.

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Summary

(Please let me know if I missed a point or misunderstood something)

Please vote on:

  1. Should the start time in each record always be the actual start time? E.g. any kind of time correction has already been applied. (Yes / No)

@crotwell
Copy link

yes

@chad-earthscope
Copy link
Member

  1. Yes. No interpretation or checking of other fields should be needed to understand the recorded start time.

@kaestli
Copy link

kaestli commented Jan 30, 2018

yes

@ozym
Copy link

ozym commented Jan 30, 2018

  1. Yes

@ketchum-usgs
Copy link

yes

@claudiodsf
Copy link

Yes

@ihenson-bsl
Copy link

  1. yes

@ValleeMartin
Copy link

  1. Yes

1 similar comment
@JoseAntonioJara
Copy link

  1. Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants